"Subclinical" pacemaker syndrome: a randomised study of symptom free patients with ventricular demand (VVI) pacemakers upgraded to dual chamber devices.

N Sulke, A Dritsas, J Bostock, A Wells, R Morris, E Sowton

Department of Cardiology, Guy's Hospital, London.

OBJECTIVE--To determine whether symptom free patients with single chamber pacemakers benefit from dual chamber pacing. DESIGN--A randomised double blind crossover comparison of ventricular demand (VVI), dual chamber demand (DDI), and dual chamber universal (DDD) modes after upgrading from a VVI device. SETTING--Cardiology outpatient department. PATIENTS--Sixteen patients aged 41-84 years who were symptom free during VVI mode pacing for three or more years. INTERVENTION--Pacemaker upgrade during routine generator change. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Change in subjective (general health perception, symptoms) and objective (clinical assessment, treadmill exercise, and radiological and echocardiographic indices) results between pacing modes before and after upgrading. RESULTS--75% preferred DDD, 68% found VVI least acceptable with 12% expressing no preference. Perceived general well-being and exercise capacity (p less than 0.01) and treadmill times (p less than 0.05) were improved in DDD mode but VVI and DDI modes were similar. Clinical, echocardiographic, radiological, and electrophysiological indices confirmed the absence of overt pacemaker syndrome, although mitral and tricuspid regurgitation was greatest in VVI mode (p less than 0.01). CONCLUSIONS--Most patients who were satisfied with long term pacing in VVI mode benefited from upgrading to DDD mode pacing suggesting the existence of "subclinical" pacemaker syndrome in up to 75% of such patients. The DDI mode offered little subjective or objective benefit over VVI mode in this population and should be reserved for patients with paroxysmal atrial arrhythmias. VVI mode pacing should be used only for patients with very intermittent symptomatic bradycardia or atrial fibrillation with a good chronotropic response during exercise.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Kaszala, K., Huizar, J. F., Ellenbogen, K. A. (2008). Contemporary Pacemakers: What the Primary Care Physician Needs to Know. Mayo Clin Proc. 83: 1170-1186 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Thackray, S. D.R., Witte, K., Ghosh, J., Nikitin, N., Anderson, A., Rigby, A., Goode, K., Clark, A. L., Cleland, J. G.F. (2006). N-terminal brain natriuretic peptide as a screening tool for heart failure in the pacemaker population. Eur Heart J 27: 447-453 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Ellenbogen, K. A., Wood, M. A. (2005). Pacemaker Selection -- The Changing Definition of Physiologic Pacing. NEJM 353: 202-204 [Full Text]  
• Rinfret, S., Cohen, D. J., Lamas, G. A., Fleischmann, K. E., Weinstein, M. C., Orav, J., Schron, E., Lee, K. L., Goldman, L. (2005). Cost-Effectiveness of Dual-Chamber Pacing Compared With Ventricular Pacing for Sinus Node Dysfunction. Circulation 111: 165-172 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Link, M. S., Hellkamp, A. S., Estes, N. A. M. III, Orav, E. J., Ellenbogen, K. A., Ibrahim, B., Greenspon, A., Rizo-Patron, C., Goldman, L., Lee, K. L., Lamas, G. A., MOST Study Investigators, (2004). High incidence of pacemaker syndrome in patients with sinus node dysfunction treated with ventricular-based pacing in the Mode Selection Trial (MOST). J Am Coll Cardiol 43: 2066-2071 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Thackray, S. D.R., Witte, K. K.A., Nikitin, N. P., Clark, A. L., Kaye, G. C., Cleland, J. G.F. (2003). The prevalence of heart failure and asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction in a typical regional pacemaker population. Eur Heart J 24: 1143-1152 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Daubert, J.C., Leclercq, C. (2002). Upgrading from ventricular to physiological pacing: is it worth it?. Eur Heart J 23: 437-441 [Full Text]  
• Hoijer, C.J, Brandt, J, Willenheimer, R, Juul-Moller, S, Bostrom, P.-A (2002). Improved cardiac function and quality of life following upgrade to dual chamber pacing after long-term ventricular stimulation. Eur Heart J 23: 490-497 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Yamamura, O., Miyoshi, Y., Hiraki, S., Ono, H., Ootaki, H., Fujiyama, J., Kuriyama, M. (2001). Spontaneous Echo Contrast in Descending Aorta Correlates with Low Blood-Flow Velocity in Carotid Arteries and Hemostatic Abnormalities. ANGIOLOGY 52: 749-758 [Abstract]  
• Gillis, A. M., Wyse, D. G., Connolly, S. J., Dubuc, M., Philippon, F., Yee, R., Lacombe, P., Rose, M. S., Kerr, C. D. (1999). Atrial Pacing Periablation for Prevention of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation. Circulation 99: 2553-2558 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• SUTTON, R. (1999). Pacemaker upgrades from ventricular to dual chamber. Europace 1: 167-167  
• Brandt, J., Hoijer, C.J., Wierup, P., Juul-Moller, S., Bostrom, P.-A (1999). Upgrade to dual chamber pacing after long-term ventricular stimulation: Feasibility and intermediate term follow-up. Europace 1: 168-173 [Abstract]  
• Lamas, G. A., Orav, E. J., Stambler, B. S., Ellenbogen, K. A., Sgarbossa, E. B., Huang, S. K. S., Marinchak, R. A., Estes, N.A. M., Mitchell, G. F., Lieberman, E. H., Mangione, C. M., Goldman, L., Griffin, J. J., Maloney, J. D., Rizo-Patron, C., Venditti, F. J., Wilkoff, B. L., The Pacemaker Selection in the Elderly Investigato, (1998). Quality of Life and Clinical Outcomes in Elderly Patients Treated with Ventricular Pacing as Compared with Dual-Chamber Pacing. NEJM 338: 1097-1104 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Hildick-Smith, D J R, Lowe, M D, Newell, S A, Schofield, P M, Shapiro, L M, Stone, D L, Grace, A A, Petch, M C (1998). Ventricular pacemaker upgrade: experience, complications and recommendations. Heart 79: 383-387 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Connolly, S. J., Kerr, C., Gent, M., Yusuf, S. (1996). Dual-Chamber Versus Ventricular Pacing: Critical Appraisal of Current Data. Circulation 94: 578-583 [Full Text]