Pericardial effusion after cardiac surgery: incidence, site, size, and haemodynamic consequences.

M Pepi, M Muratori, P Barbier, E Doria, V Arena, M Berti, F Celeste, M Guazzi, G Tamborini

Istituto di Cardiologia, Università degli Studi, Fondazione I Monzino IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

OBJECTIVE--To evaluate the incidence, characteristics, and haemodynamic consequences of pericardial effusion after cardiac surgery. DESIGN--Clinical, echocardiographic, and Doppler evaluations before and 8 days after cardiac surgery; with echocardiographic and Doppler follow up of patients with moderate or large pericardial effusion after operation. SETTING--Patients undergoing cardiac surgery at a tertiary centre. PATIENTS--803 consecutive patients who had coronary artery bypass grafting (430), valve replacement (330), and other types of surgery (43). 23 were excluded because of early reoperation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Size and site of pericardial effusion evaluated by cross sectional echocardiography and signs of cardiac tamponade detected by ultrasound (right atrial and ventricular diastolic collapse, left ventricular diastolic collapse, distension of the inferior vena cava), and Doppler echocardiography (inspiratory decrease of aortic and mitral flow velocities). RESULTS--Pericardial effusion was detected in 498 (64%) of 780 patients and was more often associated with coronary artery bypass grafting than with valve replacement or other types of surgery; it was small in 68.4%, moderate in 29.8%, and large in 1.6%. Loculated effusions (57.8%) were more frequent than diffuse ones (42.2%). The size and site of effusion were related to the type of surgery. None of the small pericardial effusions increased in size; the amount of fluid decreased within a month in most patients with moderate effusion and in a few (7 patients) developed into a large effusion and cardiac tamponade. 15 individuals (1.9%) had cardiac tamponade; this event was significantly more common after valve replacement (12 patients) than after coronary artery bypass grafting (2 patients) or other types of surgery (1 patient after pulmonary embolectomy). In patients with cardiac tamponade aortic and mitral flow velocities invariably decreased during inspiration; the echocardiographic signs were less reliable. CONCLUSIONS--Pericardial effusion after cardiac surgery is common and its size and site are related to the type of surgery. Cardiac tamponade is rare and is more common in patients receiving oral anticoagulants. Echo-Doppler imaging is useful for the evaluation of pericardial fluid accumulations after cardiac surgery. It can identify effusions that herald cardiac tamponade.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Palmer, S. L., Kelly, P. D., Schenkel, F. A., Barr, M. L. (2009). CT-Guided Tube Pericardiostomy: A Safe and Effective Technique in the Management of Postsurgical Pericardial Effusion. Am. J. Roentgenol. 193: W314-W320 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Simmons, J. S. (2009). Postoperative Critical Care Management and Selected Postoperative Crises. ACCP Crit Care Med Brd Rev 20: 261-278 [Full Text]  
• Enriquez-Sarano, M., Nkomo, V. T., Michelena, H. (2008). Principles and Practice of Echocardiography in Cardiac Surgery. Card Surg Adult 3: 315-348 [Full Text]  
• Peters, P. J., Schuck, J. (2007). Echocardiographic Assessment of Pericardial Effusion: A Brief Review. Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography 23: 189-197 [Abstract]  
• Kulik, A., Rubens, F. D., Mesana, T. G., Lam, B.-K. (2006). Early postoperative anticoagulation: more questions than answers?. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 82: 1573-1574 [Full Text]  
• Eryilmaz, S., Emiroglu, O., Eyileten, Z., Akar, R., Yazicioglu, L., Tasoz, R., Kaya, B., Uysalel, A., Ucanok, K., Corapcioglu, T., Ozyurda, U. (2006). Effect of posterior pericardial drainage on the incidence of pericardial effusion after ascending aortic surgery. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 132: 27-31 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kulik, A., Rubens, F. D., Wells, P. S., Kearon, C., Mesana, T. G., van Berkom, J., Lam, B.-K. (2006). Early Postoperative Anticoagulation After Mechanical Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 81: 770-781 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Frazier, A. A., Qureshi, F., Read, K. M., Gilkeson, R. C., Poston, R. S., White, C. S. (2005). Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts: Assessment with Multidetector CT in the Early and Late Postoperative Settings. RadioGraphics 25: 881-896 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Price, S., Prout, J., Jaggar, S. I., Gibson, D. G., Pepper, J. R. (2004). 'Tamponade' following cardiac surgery: terminology and echocardiography may both mislead. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 26: 1156-1160 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Meurin, P., Weber, H., Renaud, N., Larrazet, F., Tabet, J. Y., Demolis, P., Ben Driss, A. (2004). Evolution of the Postoperative Pericardial Effusion After Day 15: The Problem of the Late Tamponade. Chest 125: 2182-2187 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Spodick, D. H. (2003). Acute Cardiac Tamponade. NEJM 349: 684-690 [Full Text]  
• Fox, J. A., Formanek, V., Friedrich, A., Shernan, S. K. (2003). Intraoperative Echocardiography. Card Surg Adult 2: 283-314 [Full Text]  
• Vijay, V., Gold, J. P. (2003). Late Complications of Cardiac Surgery. Card Surg Adult 2: 521-537 [Full Text]  
• Kuvin, J. T., Harati, N. A., Pandian, N. G., Bojar, R. M., Khabbaz, K. R. (2002). Postoperative cardiac tamponade in the modern surgical era. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 74: 1148-1153 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Dahm, M., Hafner, G., Schinzel, H., Mayer, E., Prufer, D., Oelert, H. (2001). Early antithrombotic management after valve replacement. Eur Heart J Suppl 3: Q12-Q15 [Abstract]  
• Gibbs, C. R, Watson, R. D S, Singh, S. P, Lip, G. Y H (2000). Management of pericardial effusion by drainage: a survey of 10 years' experience in a city centre general hospital serving a multiracial population. Postgrad. Med. J. 76: 809-813 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• (1995). Pericardial Effusion Following Cardiac Surgery. Journal Watch Cardiology 1995: 8-8 [Full Text]