HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

British Heart Journal 1995;74:235-241; doi:10.1136/hrt.74.3.235
Copyright © 1995 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Cardiovascular Society

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sjöland, H.
Right arrow Articles by Herlitz, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sjöland, H.
Right arrow Articles by Herlitz, J.

Metoprolol treatment for two years after coronary bypass grafting: effects on exercise capacity and signs of myocardial ischaemia.

H. Sjöland, K. Caidahl, L. Lurje, A. Hjalmarson, J. Herlitz

Division of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden.

OBJECTIVE--To evaluate whether prophylactic treatment with metoprolol for two years after coronary artery bypass grafting improves working capacity and reduces the occurrence of myocardial ischaemia in patients with coronary artery disease. METHODS--After coronary artery bypass grafting, patients were randomised to treatment with metoprolol or placebo for two years. Two years after randomisation, a computerised 12-lead electrocardiogram was obtained during a standardised bicycle exercise test in 618 patients (64% of all those randomised). RESULTS--The median exercise capacity was 140 W in the metoprolol group (n = 307) and 130 W in the placebo group (n = 311) (P > 0.20). An ST depression of > or = 1 mm at maximum exercise was present in 34% of the patients in the metoprolol group and 38% in the placebo group (P > 0.20) and an ST depression of > or = 2 mm at maximum exercise was present in 11% in the metoprolol group and 16% in the placebo group (P = 0.09). The median values for maximum systolic blood pressure were 200 mm Hg in the metoprolol group and 210 mm Hg in the placebo group (P < 0.0001), while the median values for maximum heart rate were 126 beats/min in the metoprolol group and 143 beats/min in the placebo group (P < 0.0001). The occurrence of cardiac and neurological clinical events two years postoperatively among exercised patients was comparable in the treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS--Treatment with metoprolol for two years after coronary artery bypass grafting did not significantly change exercise capacity or electrocardiographic signs of myocardial ischaemia.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
K. Okrainec, R. Platt, L. Pilote, and M. J. Eisenberg
Cardiac medical therapy in patients after undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A review of randomized controlled trials
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 18, 2005; 45(2): 177 - 184.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
S. A. Geraci and C. K. Haan
Effect of beta blockers after coronary artery bypass in postinfarct patients: what can we learn from available literature?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2002; 74(5): 1727 - 1732.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 1995 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Cardiovascular Society