Measuring outcomes: one month survival after acute myocardial infarction in Scotland.

S. Capewell, S. Kendrick, J. Boyd, G. Cohen, E. Juszczak, J. Clarke

Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Medical School, Scotland.

OBJECTIVE: To examine 30 day survival after acute myocardial infarction as an outcome indicator, and explore the effects of adjusting for available prognostic factors such as age, sex, co-morbidity, deprivation, and deaths outside hospital. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: The Scottish Record Linkage System was analysed. This national data-base links inpatient data to death certificate information for a population of 5.1 million. SUBJECTS: All 40,371 admissions to hospital with a principal diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction, plus all 18,452 deaths outside hospital with a principal cause of death registered as acute myocardial infarction (ICD9 code 410) during 1988-1991. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcome event was death from any cause, within hospital or elsewhere, within 30 days of admission. RESULTS: During 1988-1991, 30 day survival after acute myocardial infarction was 77% in 40,371 hospital admissions, but only 53% when 18,452 acute myocardial infarction deaths in the community were included (a population-based outcome indicator with many advantages). Using logistic regression at an individual patient level, the odds of dying within 30 days effectively doubled for each decade of age (odds ratio compared with patients aged under 55: 2.3 aged 55-64, 4.4 aged 65-74, 8.2 aged 75-84, 12.0 aged 85 plus); were marginally higher in females than in males (odds ratio 1.07); were almost doubled in patients with a history of previous infarction, coronary heart disease, or other heart disease, and were also significantly increased in patients with circulatory disease, respiratory disease, neoplasm, or diabetes. Socioeconomic deprivation had no significant effect. Marked variations in survival between different hospitals and health board areas persisted, even after adjusting for the above prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: One month survival after acute myocardial infarction could be a useful means of measuring outcome of hospital care. There was important geographical variation in one month survival. These differences could be accounted for by variations in referral, admission, diagnosis, definition, and coding. These variables merit further research and local clinical audit before one month survival after acute myocardial infarction can be reliably used for detecting differences in quality of care. In addition, it would be essential to take account of infarct severity.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Measuring outcomes: one month survival after acute myocardial infarction in Scotland.

B. Juszczak, J. Boyd, and S. Capewell
Heart 1997 77: 88. [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• O'Flaherty, M., Bishop, J., Redpath, A., McLaughlin, T., Murphy, D., Chalmers, J., Capewell, S. (2009). Coronary heart disease mortality among young adults in Scotland in relation to social inequalities: time trend study. BMJ 339: b2613-b2613 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Murphy, N F, MacIntyre, K, Stewart, S, Capewell, S, McMurray, J J V (2005). Reduced between-hospital variation in short term survival after acute myocardial infarction: the result of improved cardiac care?. Heart 91: 726-730 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Abildstrom, S Z, Rasmussen, S, Rosen, M, Madsen, M (2003). Trends in incidence and case fatality rates of acute myocardial infarction in Denmark and Sweden. Heart 89: 507-511 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Stewart, S., Demers, C., Murdoch, D.R., McIntyre, K., MacLeod, M.E., Kendrick, S., Capewell, S., McMurray, J.J.V. (2002). Substantial between-hospital variation in outcome following first emergency admission for heart failure. Eur Heart J 23: 650-657 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Macintyre, K., Stewart, S., Chalmers, J., Pell, J., Finlayson, A., Boyd, J., Redpath, A., McMurray, J., Capewell, S. (2001). Relation between socioeconomic deprivation and death from a first myocardial infarction in Scotland: population based analysis. BMJ 322: 1152-1153 [Full Text]  
• West, R. (2001). Principal variable is not what it seems in league tables. BMJ 322: 1181a-1181 [Full Text]  
• Barakat, K, Stevenson, S, Wilkinson, P, Suliman, A, Ranjadayalan, K, Timmis, A D (2001). Socioeconomic differentials in recurrent ischaemia and mortality after acute myocardial infarction. Heart 85: 390-394 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Capewell, S, Livingston, B.M, MacIntyre, K, Chalmers, J.W.T, Boyd, J, Finlayson, A, Redpath, A, Pell, J.P, Evans, C.J, McMurray, J.J.V (2000). Trends in case-fatality in 117718 patients admitted with acute myocardial infarction in Scotland. Eur Heart J 21: 1833-1840 [Abstract]  
• MacIntyre, K., Capewell, S., Stewart, S., Chalmers, J.W.T., Boyd, J., Finlayson, A., Redpath, A., Pell, J.P., McMurray, J.J.V. (2000). Evidence of Improving Prognosis in Heart Failure : Trends in Case Fatality in 66 547 Patients Hospitalized Between 1986 and 1995. Circulation 102: 1126-1131 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• CAPEWELL, S., MCMURRAY, J. (2000). Coronary heart disease trends in France and elsewhere. Heart 84: 121-122 [Full Text]  
• Mahon, N G, O'Rorke, C, Codd, M B, McCann, H A, McGarry, K, Sugrue, D D (1999). Hospital mortality of acute myocardial infarction in the thrombolytic era. Heart 81: 478-482 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Poloniecki, J, Valencia, O, Littlejohns, P (1998). Cumulative risk adjusted mortality chart for detecting changes in death rate: observational study of heart surgery. BMJ 316: 1697-1700 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Morrison, C., Woodward, M., Leslie, W., Tunstall-Pedoe, H. (1997). Effect of socioeconomic group on incidence of, management of, and survival after myocardial infarction and coronary death: analysis of community coronary event register. BMJ 314: 541-541 [Abstract] [Full Text]