Measuring QT dispersion: man versus machine.

A. Murray, N. B. McLaughlin, R. W. Campbell

Regional Medical Physics Department, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.

OBJECTIVE: To compare manual and computer automated techniques for measuring QT dispersion. DESIGN: Assessment of the ability of manual and automatic measurements of QT dispersion to discriminate between a normal group and two cardiac groups. SUBJECTS: 12 simultaneous electrocardiogram leads were recorded from 25 healthy volunteers, 25 subjects after myocardial infarction, and 25 with cardiac arrhythmias. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: For each subject, QT dispersion was measured as the difference between the maximum and minimum QT from all 12 leads and separately for only those leads with T amplitudes of > 100 microV and for those > 250 microV. RESULTS: Manual QT dispersion (T > 100 microV) was greater (P < 0.02) in the arrhythmia patients (mean (SD), 45 (21) ms), but not the infarction patients (54 (36) ms), than in the normal subjects (39 (13) ms). There were no significant differences when all T waves were included. QT dispersion was significantly reduced by an average of 30% when T waves < 100 microV were excluded, and by 51% when those < 250 microV were excluded. Automatic techniques gave different measurements for dispersion in comparison with manual measurements. Three of the four automatic techniques detected significant differences between normal and both patient groups when no leads were excluded (P < 0.01) as well as when T waves < 100 microV were excluded (with increased significance, P < 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Measurements of QT dispersion from small T waves increases measurement variability and reduces the potential for detecting clinical differences. Automatic measurement of QT dispersion gives different results from manual measurement, but can satisfactorily discriminate between normal and abnormal groups with good quality electrocardiograms.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Severi, S., Grandi, E., Pes, C., Badiali, F., Grandi, F., Santoro, A. (2008). Calcium and potassium changes during haemodialysis alter ventricular repolarization duration: in vivo and in silico analysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 23: 1378-1386 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Rossenbacker, T., Priori, S. G. (2007). Clinical diagnosis of long QT syndrome: back to the caliper. Eur Heart J 28: 527-528 [Full Text]  
• Wong, K Y K, Walter, R S M., Douglas, D, Fraser, H W, Ogston, S A, Struthers, A D (2003). Long QTc predicts future cardiac death in stroke survivors. Heart 89: 377-381 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Tikiz, H., Terzi, T., Balbay, Y., Demir, A. D., Soylu, M., Keles, T., Kutuk, E. (2001). QT Dispersion in Single Coronary Artery Disease: Is There a Relation Between QT Dispersion and Diseased Coronary Artery or Lesion Localization?. ANGIOLOGY 52: 43-51 [Abstract]  
• Malik, M., Batchvarov, V. N. (2000). Measurement, interpretation and clinical potential of QT dispersion. J Am Coll Cardiol 36: 1749-1766 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Camm, A.J., Janse, M.J., Roden, D.M., Rosen, M.R., Cinca, J., Cobbe, S.M. (2000). Congenital and acquired long QT syndrome. Eur Heart J 21: 1232-1237  
• Dabrowski, A., Kramarz, E., Piotrowicz, R., Kubik, L. (2000). Predictive Power of Increased QT Dispersion in Ventricular Extrasystoles and in Sinus Beats for Risk Stratification After Myocardial Infarction. Circulation 101: 1693-1697 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kors, J. A., van Herpen, G., van Bemmel, J. H. (1999). QT Dispersion as an Attribute of T-Loop Morphology. Circulation 99: 1458-1463 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Bonnar, C E, Davie, A P, Caruana, L, Fenn, L, Ogston, S A, McMurray, J J V, Struthers, A D (1999). QT dispersion in patients with chronic heart failure: beta  blockers are associated with a reduction in QT dispersion. Heart 81: 297-302 [Abstract] [Full Text]