Comparative study of chest pain characteristics in patients with normal and abnormal coronary angiograms.

R. A. Cooke, N. Smeeton, J. B. Chambers

Department of Cardiology, Guy's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust Hospital, London, UK.

OBJECTIVE: To improve the characterisation of chest pain by comparing symptoms in patients with normal and abnormal coronary angiograms. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective case-control study. SETTING: Single tertiary cardiac referral centre. PATIENTS: 65 consecutive patients with chest pain and completely normal coronary angiograms recruited over a period of one year, and 65 sex matched patients with significant stenoses at angiography. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Standardised chest pain questionnaires. RESULTS: 61 of 65 patients (94%) and every control reported chest pain on exertion. There were no important differences in the site, quality, and radiation of pain but three symptoms had discriminatory value expressed in binary fashion ("typical" v "atypical"): the consistency with which pain was reproduced by exercise (typical, score index 10/10), the duration of pain episodes (typical, five minutes), and the frequency of pain at rest (typical, 10% all pain episodes). All three symptoms were atypical in 21 (32%) patients with normal coronary angiograms, but only one patient with an abnormal coronary angiogram. Patients with no typical features had a 2% chance of an abnormal coronary angiogram if aged under 55 years or 12% if aged 55 years or more. The additional impact of exercise stress testing was low. CONCLUSIONS: Chest pain characteristics which separate patients with normal coronary angiograms from patients with obstructive coronary heart disease can be defined objectively. This may allow improvements in referral patterns for specialist opinion or angiography, and in characterisation of patients in research studies.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• (2005). Part 5: Acute Coronary Syndromes. Circulation 112: III-55-III-72 [Full Text]  
• Swap, C. J., Nagurney, J. T. (2005). Value and Limitations of Chest Pain History in the Evaluation of Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndromes. JAMA 294: 2623-2629 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Wu, E.B., Hodson, F., Chambers, J.B. (2005). A simple score for predicting coronary artery disease in patients with chest pain. QJM 98: 803-811 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Fox, K. F (2005). Investigation and management of chest pain. Heart 91: 105-110 [Full Text]  
• Ahmed, W., Fan, T. M., Bostwick, J. M., Lee, T. H., Goldman, L. (2000). Patients with Acute Chest Pain. NEJM 343: 584-585 [Full Text]  
• JOLOBE, O M P (1998). Fax machines for thrombolysis.. Heart 80: 210-210 [Full Text]