Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Heart 1998;79:165-168; doi:10.1136/hrt.79.2.165
Copyright © 1998 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Cardiovascular Society

Heart 1998;79:165-168 ( February )

Isoprenaline and inducibility of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia

H Hatzinikolaou,a L-M Rodriguez,b J L R M Smeets,b C Timmermans,b G Vrouchos,b G Grecas,b H J J Wellensb

a Department of Cardiology, G Papanikolaou General Hospital, Exohi, Thessaloniki, Greece, b Department of Cardiology, Academic Hospital Maastricht, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, Netherlands

Correspondence to: Dr Rodriguez.

Accepted for publication 6 October 1997

Objectives---To examine the effect of isoprenaline on slow and fast pathway properties and tachycardia initiation.
Design---Consecutive patients, prospective study.
Setting---Referral centre for cardiology, academic hospital.
Patients---24 patients suffering from common type atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT).
Interventions---Programmed electrical stimulation and radiofrequency catheter ablation of the slow pathway.
Measurements and main results---AVNRT was induced before and after the administration of isoprenaline in nine patients (group 1), before isoprenaline only in five (group 2), and after isoprenaline only in 10 (group 3). The anterograde effective refractory period of the fast pathway was prolonged significantly during isoprenaline administration in group 1 (405 (31) v 335 (34) ms, p < 0.001) and shortened in group 2 (308 (57) v 324 (52) ms, p = 0.005). There was also significant shortening in group 3 (346 (85) v 395 (76) ms, p < 0.001). Isoprenaline administration did not result in a significant change of the anterograde effective refractory period of the slow pathway in groups 1 and 3, but eliminated slow pathway conduction in group 2. Isoprenaline significantly shortened the minimal and maximal atrial to His bundle conduction interval recording in response to each extrastimulus of the slow pathway (210 (24) v 267 (25) ms, p < 0.001 and 275 (25) v 328 (25) ms, p < 0.001, respectively) in group 1 and significantly prolonged these intervals (331 (34) v 274 (34) ms and 407 (33) v 351 (33) ms, respectively) in group 3. In all groups only minimal changes in the refractory period of the atrium occurred after isoprenaline administration. The effect of isoprenaline was also measured on the ventricular effective refractory period and on the minimal and maximal length of the ventriculoatrial (V2-A2) interval during ventricular pacing. Isoprenaline did not result in a significant change of the ventricular effective refractory period in groups 1 and 2 nor of the shortest and longest V2-A2 interval. In group 3, however, the ventricular effective refractory period and the shortest and longest V2-A2 interval shortened significantly after isoprenaline administration.
Conclusions---In group 1 isoprenaline did not affect inducibility of AVNRT because it prolonged the fast pathway refractory period without affecting slow pathway conduction. In group 2 isoprenaline shortened the fast pathway refractory period and appeared to abolish slow pathway conduction. Consequencely, isoprenaline prevented induction of AVNRT. In group 3 isoprenaline facilitated induction of AVNRT. This effect seemed primarily to be the result of shortening of retrograde refractoriness of the fast pathway with prolongation of slow pathway anterograde conduction and refractory period.

Keywords: atrioventricular re-entrant tachycardia;  isoprenaline


© 1998 by Heart

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Brembilla-Perrot, Béa., Muhanna, I., Nippert, M., Popovic, B., Beurrier, D., Houriez, P., Terrier de la Chaise, A., Claudon, O., Louis, P., Abdelaal, A., State, S., Andronache, M., Suty-Selton, C. (2005). Paradoxical effect of isoprenaline infusion. Europace 7: 621-627 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Weismuller, P., Kuly, S., Brandts, B., Kattenbeck, K., Ranke, C., Trappe, H. J. (2002). Is electrical stimulation during administration of catecholamines required for the evaluation of success after ablation of atrioventricular node re-entrant tachycardias?. J Am Coll Cardiol 39: 689-694 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.