Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Heart 1998;79:383-387; doi:10.1136/hrt.79.4.383
Copyright © 1998 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Cardiovascular Society

Heart 1998;79:383-387 ( April )

Ventricular pacemaker upgrade: experience, complications and recommendations

D J R Hildick-Smith, M D Lowe, S A Newell, P M Schofield, L M Shapiro, D L Stone, A A Grace, M C Petch

Department of Cardiology, Papworth Hospital, Papworth Everard Cambridge CB3 8RE, UK

Correspondence to: Dr Hildick-Smith.

Accepted for publication 18 December 1997

Objective---To assess outcomes of pacemaker upgrade from single chamber ventricular to dual chamber.
Design---Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing the procedure.
Setting---Specialist cardiothoracic unit.
Patients---44 patients (15 female, 29 male), mean (SD) age at upgrade 68.2 (12.9) years.
Interventions---Upgrade of single chamber ventricular to dual chamber pacemaker.
Main outcome measures---Procedure duration and complications.
Results---Principal indications for upgrade were pacemaker syndrome (17), "opportunistic"---that is, at elective generator replacement (8), heart failure (7), non-specific breathlessness/fatigue (7), and neurally mediated syncope (3). Mean (SD) upgrade procedure duration (82.9 (32.6) minutes) significantly exceeded mean VVI implantation duration (42.9 (13.3) minutes) and mean DDD implantation duration (56.6 (22.7) minutes) (both p < 0.01). Complications included pneumothorax (1), ventricular arrhythmia requiring cardioversion (2), protracted procedure (10), atrial lead repositioning within six weeks (8), haematoma evacuation (1), superficial infection (1), and admission to hospital with chest pain (1); 20 patients (45%) suffered one or more complications including four of the eight who underwent opportunistic upgrade.
Conclusions---Pacemaker upgrade takes longer and has a higher complication rate than either single or dual chamber pacemaker implantation. This suggests that the procedure should be performed by an experienced operator, and should be undertaken only if a firm indication exists. Patients with atrial activity should not be offered single chamber ventricular systems in the belief that the unit can be upgraded later if necessary at minimal risk.

Keywords: pacemaker upgrade;  dual chamber pacemaker;  single chamber pacemaker

© 1998 by Heart
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Wiegand, U. K. H., LeJeune, D., Boguschewski, F., Bonnemeier, H., Eberhardt, F., Schunkert, H., Bode, F. (2004). Pocket Hematoma After Pacemaker or Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Surgery: Influence of Patient Morbidity, Operation Strategy, and Perioperative Antiplatelet/Anticoagulation Therapy. Chest 126: 1177-1186 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Hoijer, C.J, Brandt, J, Willenheimer, R, Juul-Moller, S, Bostrom, P.-A (2002). Improved cardiac function and quality of life following upgrade to dual chamber pacing after long-term ventricular stimulation. Eur Heart J 23: 490-497 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Hildick-Smith, D.J.R., Grace, A.A., Petch, M.C. (2000). Permanet pacemaker upgrade. Europace 2: 186-186  
  • SUTTON, R. (1999). Pacemaker upgrades from ventricular to dual chamber. Europace 1: 167-167  
  • Brandt, J., Hoijer, C.J., Wierup, P., Juul-Moller, S., Bostrom, P.-A (1999). Upgrade to dual chamber pacing after long-term ventricular stimulation: Feasibility and intermediate term follow-up. Europace 1: 168-173 [Abstract]  
  • MARSHALL, H J, GAMMAGE, M D, GRIFFITH, M J (1998). AAI pacing for sick sinus syndrome: first choice on all counts. Heart 80: 315-316 [Full Text]  
  • GRIBBIN, G M, MCCOMB, J M, BEXTON, R S (1998). Ventricular pacemaker upgrade: experience, complications, and recommendations. Heart 80: 420-420 [Full Text]  
  • Hildick-Smith, D. J. R., Walsh, J. T., Parsonnet, V., Roelke, M., Gribbin, G. M., Parry, S. W., Lamas, G. A., Goldman, L., Mangione, C. (1998). Single-Chamber versus Dual-Chamber Pacemakers. NEJM 339: 630-632 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Show me all >>