Heart 1998;80:114-120 ( August )

Effect of time from onset to coming under care on fatality of patients with acute myocardial infarction: effect of resuscitation and thrombolytic treatment

The United Kingdom Heart Attack Study (UKHAS) Collaborative Group

Correspondence to: Dr R M Norris, Cardiac Department, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, East Sussex BN2 5BE, UK.

Accepted for publication 12 January 1998

ObjectiveTo examine the relation between time from onset of symptoms and coming under ambulance and hospital care on fatality in patients with evolving acute myocardial infarction, and on the proportions who survive because of resuscitation and thrombolytic treatment.
DesignProspective community and hospital study over two years. Delay was measured from the onset of symptoms to arrival at hospital, and from the onset to coming under care from ambulance personnel.
SettingFour general hospitals serving three United Kingdom health districts.
Patients2213 patients under 75 years of age, 111 of whom had been successfully resuscitated from out of hospital cardiac arrest.
InterventionsResuscitation from cardiac arrest; thrombolytic treatment.
Main outcome measures30 day fatality and lives saved by the two forms of treatment.
ResultsTimes from symptom onset to coming under hospital care and to starting thrombolytic treatment (given to 53% of patients) were  1 hour in 15% and 2% of patients respectively,  2 hours in 54% and 25%, and  4 hours in 67% and 55%. Overall, 30 day fatality was 138/1000 patients treated; 64/1000 (95% confidence interval 54 to 74) survived because of treatment, and 80% of this salvage was attributable to resuscitation. Delay was an important factor: 107/1000 (60 to 144) lives were saved for those coming under care within 1 hour compared with 21/1000 (5 to 37) for those who delayed for more than 12 hours. Further analysis including the 111 patients with out of hospital arrest showed that 34% of those coming to hospital by ambulance came under ambulance care within 1 hour; for this subset, 30 day fatality was 173/1000, and 136 (109 to 163) lives were saved by treatment.
ConclusionsResults of treatment are strongly related to delay in coming under care. Reduction in delay can reduce mortality from acute myocardial infarction.

Keywords: acute myocardial infarction;  fatality;  resuscitation;  thrombolytic treatment

---

© 1998 by Heart
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Dracup, K., McKinley, S., Doering, L. V., Riegel, B., Meischke, H., Moser, D. K., Pelter, M., Carlson, B., Aitken, L., Marshall, A., Cross, R., Paul, S. M. (2008). Acute Coronary Syndrome: What Do Patients Know?. Arch Intern Med 168: 1049-1054 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Moser, D. K., Kimble, L. P., Alberts, M. J., Alonzo, A., Croft, J. B., Dracup, K., Evenson, K. R., Go, A. S., Hand, M. M., Kothari, R. U., Mensah, G. A., Morris, D. L., Pancioli, A. M., Riegel, B., Zerwic, J. J. (2006). Reducing Delay in Seeking Treatment by Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome and Stroke: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Nursing and Stroke Council. Circulation 114: 168-182 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Moore, W, Kee, F, Evans, A., McCrum-Gardner, E., Morrison, C, Tunstall-Pedoe, H (2005). Pre-hospital coronary care and coronary fatality in the Belfast and Glasgow MONICA populations. Int J Epidemiol 34: 422-430 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Weston, C F M (2004). Pre-hospital resuscitation: breathing life into a stale subject. Heart 90: 1107-1109 [Full Text]  
• Leah, V, Clark, C, Doyle, K, Coats, T J (2004). Does a single bolus thrombolytic reduce door to needle time in a district general hospital?. Emerg. Med. J. 21: 162-164 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Unal, B, Critchley, J A, Capewell, S (2003). Missing, mediocre, or merely obsolete? An evaluation of UK data sources for coronary heart disease. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 57: 530-535 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Birkhead, J (2003). Where are we today? Early results from MINAP, the national audit of myocardial infarction project. Heart 89: ii13-15 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Erhardt, L., Herlitz, J., Bossaert, L., Halinen, M., Keltai, M., Koster, R., Marcassa, C., Quinn, T., van Weert, H. (2002). Task force on the management of chest pain. Eur Heart J 23: 1153-1176 [Full Text]  
• Norris, R M (2001). A new performance indicator for acute myocardial infarction. Heart 85: 395-401 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Sayer, J W, Archbold, R A, Wilkinson, P, Ray, S, Ranjadayalan, K, Timmis, A D (2000). Prognostic implications of ventricular fibrillation in acute myocardial infarction: new strategies required for further mortality reduction. Heart 84: 258-261 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Norris, R M (2000). CORONARY DISEASE: The natural history of acute myocardial infarction. Heart 83: 726-726 [Full Text]  
• (2000). Tackling myocardial infarction. DTB 38: 17-22 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• (1999). Other Articles Noted. Evid. Based Nurs. 2: 105-112 [Full Text]  
• Birkhead, J S (1999). Trends in the provision of thrombolytic treatment between 1993 and 1997. Heart 82: 438-442 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• (1998). The falling mortality from coronary heart disease: a clinicopathological perspective. Heart 80: 121-126 [Abstract] [Full Text]