Heart 1998;80:121-126 ( August )

The falling mortality from coronary heart disease: a clinicopathological perspective

The United Kingdom Heart Attack Study (UKHAS) Collaborative Group

Correspondence to: Dr R M Norris, Cardiac Department, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton BN2 5BE, UK.

Accepted for publication 13 January 1998

Objective(1) To compare mortality estimates based on clinicopathological diagnoses of death from acute coronary heart disease with official estimates of coronary heart disease mortality; (2) to compare present day mortality figures with those from earlier reports.
DesignProspective community study over the two years 1994 and 1995.
SettingThe health districts of Brighton, South Glamorgan, and York.
Subjects1589 men and women under 75 years of age who, based on our study criteria, died from acute coronary events were compared with certified cases of coronary death in the same age group.
Main outcome measures(1) Comparison of the underlying cause recorded on death certificates with the diagnosis of acute coronary death defined by our study criteria; (2) comparison of age specific mortality figures of the present with earlier studies.
ResultsUp to age 65, age specific mortality for coronary heart disease, using study criteria, was similar to official estimates. However, at ages 65-74 years there was a shortfall in study deaths of about 20% compared with official figures. One reason for this was that many death certificates in elderly people attributed death to coronary disease in the absence of confirmatory evidence. Despite this, deaths in the under 65 age group in the 1990s appear to be occurring in people who are about 10 years older than was the case during the 1970s.
ConclusionsThere are differences, most noticeable in elderly subjects, between estimates of coronary mortality made according to strict clinical and pathological definitions and official rates based on death certification. Recognition of these differences will be important for future epidemiological studies.

Keywords: mortality;  coronary heart disease;  clinicopathological diagnosis;  epidemiology

---

© 1998 by Heart
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• O'Flaherty, M., Bishop, J., Redpath, A., McLaughlin, T., Murphy, D., Chalmers, J., Capewell, S. (2009). Coronary heart disease mortality among young adults in Scotland in relation to social inequalities: time trend study. BMJ 339: b2613-b2613 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Sapsford, R.J., Lawrance, R.A., Dorsch, M.F., Das, R., Jackson, B.M., Morrell, C., Robinson, M.B., Hall, A.S. (2003). Identifying acute myocardial infarction: effects on treatment and mortality, and implications for National Service Framework audit. QJM 96: 203-209 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• MacIntyre, K., Stewart, S., Capewell, S., Chalmers, J. W. T., Pell, J. P., Boyd, J., Finlayson, A., Redpath, A., Gilmour, H., McMurray, J. J. V. (2001). Gender and survival: a population-based study of 201,114 men and women following a first acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 38: 729-735 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• PENNY, W. J (2001). Patient delay in calling for help: the weakest link in the chain of survival?. Heart 85: 121-122 [Full Text]  
• Dargie, H. J., The CAPRICORN Steering Committee, (2000). Design and methodology of the CAPRICORN trial -- a randomised double blind placebo controlled study of the impact of carvedilol on morbidity and mortality in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. Eur J Heart Fail 2: 325-332 [Full Text]  
• BIRKHEAD, J S (2000). Responding to the requirements of the National Service Framework for coronary disease: a core data set for myocardial infarction. Heart 84: 116-117 [Full Text]  
• TUNSTALL-PEDOE, H. (1998). Perspectives on trends in mortality and case fatality from coronary heart attacks: the need for a better definition of acute myocardial infarction. Heart 80: 112-113 [Full Text]