Heart 1998;80:251-256 ( September )
Prognostic significance of electrical alternans versus signal averaged electrocardiography in predicting the outcome of electrophysiological testing and arrhythmia-free survival
a Harvard
University -Massachusetts Institute of Technology Division of Health
Sciences and Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, b Departments of
Medicine and Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University,
Cleveland, Ohio, USA, c The
Cardiac Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts,
USA
Correspondence to: Dr R J Cohen, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, E25-335, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. email: rjcohen{at}mit.edu
Accepted for publication 30 March 1998
Objective
To
investigate the accuracy of signal averaged electrocardiography (SAECG)
and measurement of microvolt level T wave alternans as predictors of
susceptibility to ventricular arrhythmias.
Design
Analysis of new
data from a previously published prospective investigation.
Setting
Electrophysiology
laboratory of a major referral hospital.
Patients and
interventions
43 patients, not on class I or class
III antiarrhythmic drug treatment, undergoing invasive
electrophysiological testing had SAECG and T wave alternans
measurements. The SAECG was considered positive in the presence of one
(SAECG-I) or two (SAECG-II) of three standard criteria. T wave
alternans was considered positive if the alternans ratio exceeded 3.0.
Main outcome
measures
Inducibility of sustained
ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation during electrophysiological
testing, and 20 month arrhythmia-free survival.
Results
The
accuracy of T wave alternans in predicting the outcome of
electrophysiological testing was 84% (p < 0.0001). Neither SAECG-I (accuracy 60%; p < 0.29) nor SAECG-II (accuracy 71%; p < 0.10) was a statistically significant predictor of electrophysiological testing. SAECG, T wave alternans, electrophysiological testing, and
follow up data were available in 36 patients while not on class I or
III antiarrhythmic agents. The accuracy of T wave alternans in
predicting the outcome of arrhythmia-free survival was 86% (p < 0.030). Neither SAECG-I (accuracy 65%; p < 0.21) nor
SAECG-II (accuracy 71%; p < 0.48) was a statistically significant
predictor of arrhythmia-free survival.
Conclusions
T
wave alternans was a highly significant predictor of the outcome of
electrophysiological testing and arrhythmia-free survival, while SAECG
was not a statistically significant predictor. Although these results
need to be confirmed in prospective clinical studies, they suggest that
T wave alternans may serve as a non-invasive probe for screening high
risk populations for malignant ventricular arrhythmias.
© 1998 by Heart
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Narayan, S. M.
(2006). T-Wave Alternans and the Susceptibility to Ventricular Arrhythmias. J Am Coll Cardiol
47: 269-281
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Gehi, A. K., Stein, R. H., Metz, L. D., Gomes, J. A.
(2005). Microvolt T-Wave Alternans for the Risk Stratification of Ventricular Tachyarrhythmic Events: A Meta-Analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol
46: 75-82
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Walker, M. L, Rosenbaum, D. S
(2003). Repolarization alternans: implications for the mechanism and prevention of sudden cardiac death. Cardiovasc Res
57: 599-614
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Armoundas, A. A., Tomaselli, G. F., Esperer, H. D.
(2002). Pathophysiological basis and clinical application of T-wave alternans. J Am Coll Cardiol
40: 207-217
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Kitamura, H., Ohnishi, Y., Okajima, K., Ishida, A., Galeano, E., Adachi, K., Yokoyama, M.
(2002). Onset heart rate of microvolt-level T-wave alternans provides clinical and prognostic value in nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol
39: 295-300
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
ECTOR, H
(1999). Prognostic significance of electrical alternans v signal averaged ECG in predicting the outcome of electrophysiological testing and arrhythmia-free survival. Heart
82: 534d-534
[Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
