Heart 1998;80:296-298 ( September )
Nuclear cardiology in the UK 1994: activity relative to Europe, USA, and British Cardiac Society targets
a Magnetic Resonance
Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK, b Department of Nuclear Medicine, University
College London Medical School, London, UK, c Department of Nuclear Cardiology, University
Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK, d Department
of Cardiology, Hull Royal Infirmary, Hull, UK
Correspondence to: Dr D J Pennell, Director Clinical MRI, Royal Brompton Hospital Sydney Street, London SW3 6NP, UK email:d.pennell{at}ic.ac.uk
Objective
To survey
practice in nuclear cardiology in the UK in 1994.
Design
A questionnaire
was sent to 219 centres performing nuclear imaging asking for details
of current practice in nuclear cardiology. Replies were received from
192 centres (88%).
Main outcome
measures
Activity in performance of myocardial
perfusion imaging (MPI) and radionuclide ventriculography (RNV),
anticipated changes in activity, differences between regional and
district hospitals, technical imaging parameters, and referral sources.
Results
Of the
responding centres, 125 (65%) performed nuclear cardiology procedures.
More regional than district hospitals performed nuclear cardiology
procedures (85% v 55%, p < 0.0003) and
regional centres performed a higher proportion (62%
v 24%, p < 0.001) of nuclear cardiology
activity. Nuclear cardiology activity was 0.82 scans per 1000 population per year (MPI 0.56, RNV 0.26). There has been a significant
increase (24%) in nuclear cardiology since 1988. There has been a
pronounced rise in MPI (350%) while RNV has fallen by 47%. Myocardial
perfusion activity in the UK remains very low (25% and 5% in regional
and district hospitals, respectively) compared with the 1994 figures of
2.2/1000/year for Europe or 10.8/1000/year for the USA.
Conclusions
MPI has
increased on average by 23%/annum (compound rate) since 1988, but in
1994 was still only 32% of the British Cardiac Society target of
2.6/1000/year. Proper resources for capital expenditure on new
equipment and new staff will be important to maintain momentum in
closing the gap. Also important is improved clinical understanding, as
already implemented by including nuclear cardiology in guidelines for
specialist cardiology training.
© 1998 by Heart
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
