Heart 1999;81:586-592 ( June )

Waiting times and prioritisation for coronary artery bypass surgery in New Zealand

M E Seddon, J K French, D J Amos, K Ramanathan, S C McLaughlin, H D White

Cardiovascular Research Unit, Green Lane Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand

Correspondence to: Professor H White, Cardiology Department, Green Lane Hospital, Private Bag 92 189, Auckland 1030, New Zealand. email: harveyw{at}ahsl.co.nz

Accepted for publication 5 August 1998

OBJECTIVESTo review the New Zealand coronary artery bypass priority score instituted in May 1996, and specifically to determine whether it prioritises patients at high risk of cardiac events while waiting. The New Zealand score is compared with the Ontario urgency rating score, and waiting times for surgery are compared with the maximum times recommended by the Ontario consensus panel.
DESIGNRetrospective review of patients accepted for isolated coronary artery bypass surgery between 1 January 1993 and 31 January 1996.
SETTINGGreen Lane Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURESWaiting time, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and cardiac readmission.
RESULTSThe median waiting times were five days for hospital cases (n = 721) and 146 days for out of hospital cases (n = 701). Of the latter group, 28% waited more than a year, 33% had their surgery expedited because of worsening symptoms, and 19% failed to meet the cut off point set by the New Zealand score for acceptance onto the list. Twenty two patients died, 18 on the outpatient waiting list (waiting list mortality 2.6%, risk 0.28% per month of waiting), and 132 were readmitted, 12% with myocardial infarction and 76% with unstable angina. Risk factors for a composite end point of death or myocardial infarction and/or cardiac readmission were: previous coronary artery bypass surgery (p = 0.001), class III or IV angina (p = 0.002), and hypertension (p = 0.005). The New Zealand score did not identify those at risk. Excluding hospital cases, 32% had surgery within the time recommended by the Ontario consensus panel.
CONCLUSIONSWaiting times for coronary artery bypass surgery in New Zealand are considerably longer than those in Ontario, Canada. By using a numerical cut off point, implementation of the New Zealand priority scoring system has restricted access to coronary surgery on the basis of funding constraints rather than clinical appropriateness. The score does not add greatly to the clinicians' prioritisation in predicting those patients who will suffer events while waiting.


Keywords: coronary artery bypass surgery; prioritisation

---

© 1999 by Heart
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Willcox, S., Seddon, M., Dunn, S., Edwards, R. T., Pearse, J., Tu, J. V. (2007). Measuring And Reducing Waiting Times: A Cross-National Comparison Of Strategies. Health Aff (Millwood) 26: 1078-1087 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Rexius, H., Brandrup-Wognsen, G., Nilsson, J., Oden, A., Jeppsson, A. (2006). A Simple Score to Assess Mortality Risk in Patients Waiting for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 81: 577-582 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Rexius, H., Brandrup-Wognsen, G., Oden, A., Jeppsson, A. (2005). Waiting Time and Mortality After Elective Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 79: 538-543 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Rexius, H., Brandrup-Wognsen, G., Oden, A., Jeppsson, A. (2004). Gender and mortality risk on the waiting list for coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 26: 521-527 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Rexius, H., Brandrup-Wognsen, G., Oden, A., Jeppsson, A. (2004). Mortality on the waiting list for coronary artery bypass grafting: incidence and risk factors. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 77: 769-774 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Cesena, F. H. Y., Favarato, D., Cesar, L. A. M., de Oliveira, S. A., da Luz, P. L. (2004). Cardiac complications during waiting for elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery: incidence, temporal distribution and predictive factors. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 25: 196-202 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Martin, R M, Gunnell, D, Karsch, K R, Frankel, S (2002). Mortality and morbidity surrounding coronary artery bypass surgery and the public presentation of risk. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 56: 430-431 [Full Text]  
• Derrett, S., Devlin, N., Harrison, A. (2002). Waiting in the NHS, Part 2: a change of prescription. JRSM 95: 280-283 [Full Text]  
• Sampalis, J., Boukas, S., Liberman, M., Reid, T., Dupuis, G. (2001). Impact of waiting time on the quality of life of patients awaiting coronary artery bypass grafting. CMAJ 165: 429-433 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Bowling, A, Bond, M, McKee, D, McClay, M, Banning, A P, Dudley, N, Elder, A, Martin, A, Blackman, I (2001). Equity in access to exercise tolerance testing, coronary angiography, and coronary artery bypass grafting by age, sex and clinical indications. Heart 85: 680-686 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• British Cardiac Society Guidelines and Medical Pra, , Royal College of Physicians Clinical Effectiveness, (2001). Guideline for the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes without persistent ECG ST segment elevation. Heart 85: 133-142 [Full Text]  
• Liratsopulos, G. (2000). Waiting time for cardiac surgery in Scotland is relatively short. BMJ 320: 1147-1147 [Full Text]  
• SHERLAW-JOHNSON, C (1999). Managing waiting lists for cardiac surgery. Heart 81: 563-563 [Full Text]  
• BRIDGEWATER, B. (1999). Death on the waiting list for cardiac surgery. Heart 81: 564-564 [Full Text]