Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Heart 1999;82:420-425; doi:10.1136/hrt.82.4.420
Copyright © 1999 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Cardiovascular Society
Heart 1999;82:420-425 ( October )

Spectrum of reperfusion strategies and factors influencing the use of primary angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted to hospitals with the facilities to perform primary angioplasty

R Zahna, R Schielea, K Seidla, K E Hauptmannb, T Voigtländerc, H-J Rupprechtc, M Gottwikd, H G Glunze, J Sengesa, for the Maximal Individual Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction (MITRA) Study Group

a Herzzentrum Ludwigshafen, Department of Cardiology, Bremserstrabeta e 79, D-67063 Ludwigshafen, Germany, b Innere Medizin, Abt. für Kardiologie, Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder, Trier, Germany, c II Med. Klinik, Johannes Gutenberg Universität, Mainz, Germany, d Med. Klinik 8-Kardiologie, Klinikum Nürnberg Süd, Germany, e Abteilung für Kardiologie, Westpfalzklinikum, Kaiserslautern, Germany

Correspondence to: Dr Zahn.

Accepted for publication 19 March 1999

OBJECTIVE---To determine the frequency of the use of primary angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction and the factors influencing its indications in hospitals with the facilities to perform this treatment.
DESIGN---Data from the maximal individual therapy in acute myocardial infarction (MITRA) trial were analysed, concerning the effects of the decisions of individual hospitals, the time of admission of patients, and the effects of patient characteristics on the selection of reperfusion treatment.
PATIENTS---Between June 1994 and January 1997 eight hospitals treated 1532 patients with acute myocardial infarction. 418 (27.3%) were treated conservatively, 641 (41.8%) were treated using intravenous thrombolysis, 387 (25.3%) were treated using primary angioplasty, and 86 (5.6%) received a combination of thrombolysis and angioplasty.
RESULTS---The proportion of patients treated with primary angioplasty varied from 1.8% to 57.7% among the eight hospitals. The use of primary angioplasty during non-office hours also showed wide variation, ranging from 20% to 54% between centres. The use of thrombolysis was comparatively evenly distributed during the non-office hours, ranging from 50-69%. Four hospitals with a primary angioplasty use rate > 30% showed no difference in the proportion of patients with contraindications for thrombolysis, high risk patients, or a combination of both, when compared with four hospitals with a lower rate of primary angioplasty use (98/322 (30.4%) v 19/65 (29.2%), respectively, p = 0.847).
CONCLUSIONS---In hospitals with the facilities for performing primary angioplasty the most important factors influencing its use were the discretion of the individual hospital and the time of patient admission. Characteristics of patients did not influence the choice of reperfusion treatment


Keywords: acute myocardial infarction; primary angioplasty; reperfusion treatment


© 1999 by Heart

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Zahn, R., Schiele, R., Schneider, S., Gitt, A. K., Wienbergen, H., Seidl, K., Voigtlander, T., Gottwik, M., Berg, G., Altmann, E., Rosahl, W., Senges, J., for the Maximal Individual Therapy in Acute Myocar, (2001). Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction: can we define subgroups of patients benefiting most from primary angioplasty?: Results from the pooled data of the maximal individual therapy in acute myocardial infarction registry and the myocardial infarction registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 37: 1827-1835 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • BRENER, S, TOPOL, E J (1999). Logic and logistics: conundrum in reperfusion treatment for acute myocardial infarction. Heart 82: 402-403 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.