Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Heart 2000;83:641-644; doi:10.1136/heart.83.6.641
Copyright © 2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Cardiovascular Society
Heart 2000;83:641-644 ( June )

Cardiovascular medicine

Measuring the health related quality of life of people with ischaemic heart disease M Dempster, M Donnelly

Health and Social Care Research Unit, The Queen's University of Belfast, Mulhouse Building, Grosvenor Road, Belfast BT12 6BJ, UK

Correspondence to: Dr Dempster email: m.dempster{at}qub.ac.uk

Accepted 29 June 1999

OBJECTIVES---To inform researchers and clinicians about the most appropriate generic and disease specific measures of health related quality of life for use among people with ischaemic heart disease.
METHODS---MEDLINE and BIDS were searched for research papers which contained a report of at least one of the three most common generic instruments or at least one of the five disease specific instruments used with ischaemic heart disease patients. Evidence for the validity, reliability, and sensitivity of these instruments was critically appraised.
RESULTS---Of the three generic measures---the Nottingham health profile, sickness impact profile, and short form 36 (SF-36)---the SF-36 appears to offer the most reliable, valid, and sensitive assessment of quality of life. However, a few of the SF-36 subscales lack a sufficient degree of sensitivity to detect change in a patient's clinical condition. According to the best available evidence, the quality of life after myocardial infarction questionnaire should be preferred to the Seattle angina questionnaire, the quality of life index cardiac version, the angina pectoris quality of life questionnaire, and the summary index. Overall, research on disease specific measures is sparse compared to the number of studies which have investigated generic measures.
CONCLUSIONS---An assessment of the quality of life of people with ischaemic heart disease should comprise a disease specific measure in addition to a generic measure. The SF-36 and the quality of life after myocardial infarction questionnaire (version 2) are the most appropriate currently available generic and disease specific measures of health related quality of life, respectively. Further research into the measurement of health related quality of life of people with ischaemic heart disease is required in order to address the problems (such as lack of sensitivity to detect change) identified by the review.


Keywords: quality of life; outcome measurement; ischaemic heart disease


© 2000 by Heart

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Sansgiry, S. S, Chien, C., Jayawant, S. S, Raju, A. (2008). Comparison of the Short-Form Survey 12 and the MacNew Heart Disease Health-Related Quality of Life Survey Among Patients with Cardiac Disease. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 42: 200-206 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Pettersen, K. I., Reikvam, A., Rollag, A., Stavem, K. (2005). Reliability and validity of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire in patients with previous myocardial infarction. Eur J Heart Fail 7: 235-242 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kim, J., Henderson, R. A., Pocock, S. J., Clayton, T., Sculpher, M. J., Fox, K. A.A., RITA-3 Trial Investigators, (2005). Health-related quality of life after interventional or conservative strategy in patients with unstable angina or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: One-year results of the third randomized intervention trial of unstable angina (RITA-3). J Am Coll Cardiol 45: 221-228 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Zhang, Z., Mahoney, E. M., Stables, R. H., Booth, J., Nugara, F., Spertus, J. A., Weintraub, W. S. (2003). Disease-Specific Health Status After Stent-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: One-Year Results From the Stent or Surgery Trial. Circulation 108: 1694-1700 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Stables, R H (2002). Observational research in the evidence based environment: eclipsed by the randomised controlled trial?. Heart 87: 101-102 [Full Text]  
  • Dempster, M., Donnelly, M. (2001). A Comparative Analysis of the SF-12 and the SF-36 among Ischaemic Heart Disease Patients. J Health Psychol 6: 707-711 [Abstract]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.