Cardiovascular medicine
Measuring the health related quality of life of people with
ischaemic heart disease
M Dempster, M Donnelly
Health and Social
Care Research Unit, The Queen's University of Belfast, Mulhouse
Building, Grosvenor Road, Belfast BT12 6BJ, UK
Correspondence to: Dr Dempster email: m.dempster{at}qub.ac.uk
Accepted 29 June 1999
OBJECTIVES
To inform researchers and clinicians about the
most appropriate generic and disease specific measures of health
related quality of life for use among people with ischaemic heart disease.
METHODS
MEDLINE and BIDS were searched for research
papers which contained a report of at least one of the three most
common generic instruments or at least one of the five disease specific
instruments used with ischaemic heart disease patients. Evidence for
the validity, reliability, and sensitivity of these instruments was
critically appraised.
RESULTS
Of the three generic measures
the Nottingham
health profile, sickness impact profile, and short form 36 (SF-36)
the
SF-36 appears to offer the most reliable, valid, and sensitive
assessment of quality of life. However, a few of the SF-36 subscales
lack a sufficient degree of sensitivity to detect change in a
patient's clinical condition. According to the best available
evidence, the quality of life after myocardial infarction questionnaire should be preferred to the Seattle angina questionnaire, the quality of
life index cardiac version, the angina pectoris quality of life
questionnaire, and the summary index. Overall, research on disease
specific measures is sparse compared to the number of studies which
have investigated generic measures.
CONCLUSIONS
An assessment of the quality of life of
people with ischaemic heart disease should comprise a disease specific
measure in addition to a generic measure. The SF-36 and the quality of
life after myocardial infarction questionnaire (version 2) are the most
appropriate currently available generic and disease specific measures
of health related quality of life, respectively. Further research into
the measurement of health related quality of life of people with
ischaemic heart disease is required in order to address the problems
(such as lack of sensitivity to detect change) identified by the review.
Keywords: quality of life; outcome measurement; ischaemic heart disease
© 2000 by Heart
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Sansgiry, S. S, Chien, C., Jayawant, S. S, Raju, A.
(2008). Comparison of the Short-Form Survey 12 and the MacNew Heart Disease Health-Related Quality of Life Survey Among Patients with Cardiac Disease. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy
42: 200-206
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Pettersen, K. I., Reikvam, A., Rollag, A., Stavem, K.
(2005). Reliability and validity of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire in patients with previous myocardial infarction. Eur J Heart Fail
7: 235-242
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Kim, J., Henderson, R. A., Pocock, S. J., Clayton, T., Sculpher, M. J., Fox, K. A.A., RITA-3 Trial Investigators,
(2005). Health-related quality of life after interventional or conservative strategy in patients with unstable angina or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: One-year results of the third randomized intervention trial of unstable angina (RITA-3). J Am Coll Cardiol
45: 221-228
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Zhang, Z., Mahoney, E. M., Stables, R. H., Booth, J., Nugara, F., Spertus, J. A., Weintraub, W. S.
(2003). Disease-Specific Health Status After Stent-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: One-Year Results From the Stent or Surgery Trial. Circulation
108: 1694-1700
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Stables, R H
(2002). Observational research in the evidence based environment: eclipsed by the randomised controlled trial?. Heart
87: 101-102
[Full Text] -
Dempster, M., Donnelly, M.
(2001). A Comparative Analysis of the SF-12 and the SF-36 among Ischaemic Heart Disease Patients. J Health Psychol
6: 707-711
[Abstract]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
