Cardiovascular medicine
Improving door to needle times with nurse initiated thrombolysis
P Wilmshursta, A Purchasea, C Webba, C Jowettb, T Quinnc
a Department of
Cardiology, Royal Shrewsbury Hospital, Shrewsbury SY3 8XQ, UK, b Department of Clinical Audit, c NHS Executive West Midlands, Department of
Health, Birmingham B15 3DP, UK
Correspondence to: Dr Wilmshurst
Accepted 25 April 2000
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the effect of
nurse initiated thrombolysis on door to needle time (the interval
between arriving at the hospital and starting thrombolytic treatment)
in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
DESIGN
Comparison of door to needle
times before and after the employment of nurses trained and approved to
initiate thrombolysis without prescription by a doctor but with a
protocol for rapid triage of patients with chest pain.
SETTING
A district general hospital.
SUBJECTS
All patients admitted with
suspected myocardial infarction between April 1995 and March 1999.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
Speed (door to
needle time) and appropriateness of administration of thrombolytic
drugs to patients with acute myocardial infarction who gave a
characteristic history and had appropriate criteria on the admission ECG.
RESULTS
During seven periods (each of
four months) before the introduction of nurse initiated thrombolysis
and a new chest pain triage protocol, the median door to needle time
varied from 50-58 minutes. In four periods (each of 4-6 months)
following the introduction of the changes, the median door to needle
time was 25-30 minutes. The improvement was significant
(p < 0.001). Nurses trained to initiate thrombolysis currently
provide cover for 66% of the time. Median door to needle time for
nurses was 15 minutes. Median door to needle time for junior doctors
improved to 35 minutes. The median door to needle times when nurses
initiated thrombolysis was significantly shorter than when doctors
did so (p < 0.001). There have been no inappropriate management
decisions by nurses approved to initiate thrombolysis.
CONCLUSIONS
The use of nurse
initiated thrombolysis has resulted in a clinically important reduction
in the time taken for thrombolysis to be started in patients with acute
myocardial infarction.
Keywords: thrombolysis; acute myocardial infarction; door to needle time
© 2000 by Heart
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Quinn, T
(2008). Other clinicians play a part in expediting reperfusion. Emerg. Med. J.
25: 122-122
[Full Text] -
Corfield, A R, Graham, C A, Adams, J N, Booth, I, McGuffie, A C
(2004). Emergency department thrombolysis improves door to needle times. Emerg. Med. J.
21: 676-680
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Heath, S M, Bain, R J I, Andrews, A, Chida, S, Kitchen, S I, Walters, M I
(2003). Nurse initiated thrombolysis in the accident and emergency department: safe, accurate, and faster than fast track. Emerg. Med. J.
20: 418-420
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
(2002). Fifth report on the provision of services for patients with heart disease. Heart
88: iii1-56
[Full Text] -
Stephenson, D T, Wardrope, J W, Goodacre, S W
(2002). Is prehospital thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction warranted in the urban setting? The case against. Emerg. Med. J.
19: 444-447
[Abstract] [Full Text]
eLetters:
Read all eLetters
- Improving door to needle time – time to train ALL staff
- Gideon Hirschfield
- Online, 18 Sep 2000 [Full text]
- Re: Improving door to needle time – time to train ALL staff
- Peter Wilmshurst
- Online, 18 Sep 2000 [Full text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
