Cardiovascular medicine
A new performance indicator for acute myocardial infarction
R M Norris*, on behalf of the Southern Heart Attack Response
Project (SHARP) Investigators
Royal Sussex County
Hospital, Cardiac Research Department, 1 Abbey Road, Brighton, East
Sussex BN2 1ES, UK
Correspondence to: Dr Norris robin.norris{at}talk21.com
Accepted 8 November
2000
OBJECTIVE
To develop a performance
indicator for acute myocardial infarction which would reliably measure
success of treatment and which might provide an alternative to case
fatality as an audited outcome.
DESIGN
A two year audit of all cases
of acute myocardial infarction and resuscitated cases of out of
hospital cardiac arrest from coronary heart disease in patients under
75 years of age. Behaviour of patients in calling for help, performance
of the ambulance services in treating out of hospital arrest, and of
the hospitals in providing resuscitation and thrombolytic treatment are
audited separately.
SETTING
Four district general hospitals.
AUDITED INTERVENTIONS
Resuscitation
from cardiac arrest and thrombolytic treatment.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
Hospital case
fatality and lives saved/1000 patients treated.
RESULTS
Overall, the lives of 83/1000
patients were saved (95% confidence interval 70 to 96). Of these, 29 (35%) were saved by out of hospital resuscitation and 38 (46%) by in
hospital resuscitation from cardiac arrest. It was estimated that 16 lives (19%) were saved by thrombolytic treatment. There were no
significant differences in case fatality among the hospitals.
CONCLUSIONS
Lives saved/1000 patients
treated is an easily measurable index and assesses performance of the
ambulance service as well as of the hospital. Because it is relatively
insensitive to diagnostic definitions, it may provide a robust
alternative to case fatality as a performance indicator.
Keywords: acute myocardial infarction; audit; case fatality; outcome indicators
* A list of participating centres and investigators appears at the end of this report.
© 2001 by Heart
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Chase, D, Roderick, P, Cooper, K, Davies, R, Quinn, T, Raftery, J
(2006). Using simulation to estimate the cost effectiveness of improving ambulance and thrombolysis response times after myocardial infarction. Emerg. Med. J.
23: 67-72
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Levin, K. A., Leyland, A. H.
(2006). Urban-Rural Inequalities in Ischemic Heart Disease in Scotland, 1981-1999. AJPH
96: 145-151
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Norris, R M, on behalf of the UK Heart Attack Study (UKHAS) Col,
(2005). Circumstances of out of hospital cardiac arrest in patients with ischaemic heart disease. Heart
91: 1537-1540
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Sapsford, R.J., Lawrance, R.A., Dorsch, M.F., Das, R., Jackson, B.M., Morrell, C., Robinson, M.B., Hall, A.S.
(2003). Identifying acute myocardial infarction: effects on treatment and mortality, and implications for National Service Framework audit. QJM
96: 203-209
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Gershlick, A H
(2001). The acute management of myocardial infarction. Br Med Bull
59: 89-112
[Abstract] [Full Text]
eLetters:
Read all eLetters
- New performance indicator should take account of prehospital thrombolysis
- John Rawles
- Online, 19 Apr 2001 [Full text]
- Re: New performance indicator should take account of prehospital thrombolysis
- Robin Norris
- Online, 19 Apr 2001 [Full text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
