Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Heart 2001;85:549-555; doi:10.1136/heart.85.5.549
Copyright © 2001 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Cardiovascular Society
Heart 2001;85:549-555 ( May )

Cardiovascular medicine

Effect of power Doppler and digital subtraction techniques on the comparison of myocardial contrast echocardiography with SPECT B Haluska, C Case, L Short, J Anderson, T H Marwick

University of Queensland, Department of Medicine, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Ipswich Road, Brisbane, Qld 4102, Brisbane, Australia

Correspondence to: Professor Marwick tmarwick{at}medicine.pa.uq.edu.au

Accepted 18 January 2000

OBJECTIVE---To compare the accuracy and feasibility of harmonic power Doppler and digitally subtracted colour coded grey scale imaging for the assessment of perfusion defect severity by single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in an unselected group of patients.
DESIGN---Cohort study.
SETTING---Regional cardiothoracic unit.
PATIENTS---49 patients (mean (SD) age 61 (11) years; 27 women, 22 men) with known or suspected coronary artery disease were studied with simultaneous myocardial contrast echo (MCE) and SPECT after standard dipyridamole stress.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES---Regional myocardial perfusion by SPECT, performed with 99mTc tetrafosmin, scored qualitatively and also quantitated as per cent maximum activity.
RESULTS---Normal perfusion was identified by SPECT in 225 of 270 segments (83%). Contrast echo images were interpretable in 92% of patients. The proportion of normal MCE by grey scale, subtracted, and power Doppler techniques were respectively 76%, 74%, and 88% (p < 0.05) at > 80% of maximum counts, compared with 65%, 69%, and 61% at < 60% of maximum counts. For each technique, specificity was lowest in the lateral wall, although power Doppler was the least affected. Grey scale and subtraction techniques were least accurate in the septal wall, but power Doppler showed particular problems in the apex. On a per patient analysis, the sensitivity was 67%, 75%, and 83% for detection of coronary artery disease using grey scale, colour coded, and power Doppler, respectively, with a significant difference between power Doppler and grey scale only (p < 0.05). Specificity was also the highest for power Doppler, at 55%, but not significantly different from subtracted colour coded images.
CONCLUSIONS---Myocardial contrast echo using harmonic power Doppler has greater accuracy than with grey scale imaging and digital subtraction. However, power Doppler appears to be less sensitive for mild perfusion defects.


Keywords: myocardial contrast echo; SPECT; coronary artery disease; dipyridamole stress


© 2001 by Heart

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Tousek, P, Orban, M, Martinoff, S, Firschke, C (2005). Assessment of infarcted myocardium with real time myocardial contrast echocardiography: comparison with technetium-99m sestamibi single photon emission computed tomography. Heart 91: 1568-1572 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Yu, E. H. C., Skyba, D. M., Leong-Poi, H., Sloggett, C., Jamorski, M., Garg, R., Iwanochko, R. M., Siu, S. C. (2004). Incremental value of parametric quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion by triggered Low-Power myocardial contrast echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 43: 1807-1813 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Khoury, V K, Haluska, B, Prins, J, Marwick, T H (2003). Effects of glucose-insulin-potassium infusion on chronic ischaemic left ventricular dysfunction. Heart 89: 61-65 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Henein, M., Gibson, D. (2002). Dobutamine stress echocardiography: the long and short of it. Eur Heart J 23: 520-522 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.