Interventional cardiology surgery
Risks of elective cardiac surgery: what do patients want to know?
N Beresforda, L Seymourb, C Vincentb, N Moata
a Royal Brompton and
Harefield NHS Trust, Sydney Street, London SW3 6NP, UK, b University College
London, Clinical Risk Unit, Psychology Department, 1-19 Torrington
Place, London WC1E 6BT, UK
Correspondence to: Dr Beresford n.beresford{at}rbh.nthames.nhs.uk
Accepted 4 June 2001
OBJECTIVE
To examine patients'
individual requirements for risk disclosure before surgery.
DESIGN
Structured interview and questionnaire.
SETTING
50 patients interviewed
following coronary artery bypass grafting or valve replacement or repair.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
Patient
assessment of the nature and probability of risks they would have
wished to be informed of from a pool comprising death and 13 postoperative complications.
RESULTS
Out of 50 patients, 21 (42%)
wanted no risk information at all, 25 (50%) did not want to be advised
of the risk of death, and 27 (54%) did not want information about the
risk of permanent stroke. This contrasts with standard practice of
routinely informing patients of the risk of death and stroke. However,
there were pronounced individual patient preferences. Three groups of
patients emerged: those requiring little or no risk information, those requiring information about major risks, and those requiring full risk
disclosure. Patients were not generally concerned about the specific
probabilities of any risk.
CONCLUSIONS
Clinicians counselling
patients before operation should routinely discuss patient preferences
before risk disclosure, distinguishing among a preference for "no
risk information", "all potentially relevant risks", and "those
risks considered significant or likely to occur". The fact of
individual patient preferences may undermine the concept of the
"reasonable patient" in determination of the legal requirements for
risk disclosure. Future studies, in addition to replicating the present
findings, should examine the reasons underlying individual patient
preferences and the long term implications of degrees of risk
disclosure, particularly when adverse outcomes occur.
Keywords: cardiac surgery; risk; patient information
© 2001 by Heart
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Uzbeck, M, Quinn, C, Saleem, I, Cotter, P, Gilmartin, J J, O'Keeffe, S T
(2009). Randomised controlled trial of the effect of standard and detailed risk disclosure prior to bronchoscopy on peri-procedure anxiety and satisfaction. Thorax
64: 224-227
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Ivarsson, B., Larsson, S., Luhrs, C., Sjoberg, T.
(2005). Extended written pre-operative information about possible complications at cardiac surgery--do the patients want to know?. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.
28: 407-414
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
(2003). Minerva. BMJ
327: E94-94
[Full Text] -
Doyal, L
(2002). Good clinical practice and informed consent are inseparable. Heart
87: 103-105
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
KURBAAN, A. S, SMITH, S., MILLS, P. G
(2001). Consent in cardiac practice. Heart
86: 593-594
[Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
