CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE

Exercise systolic blood pressures are of questionable value in the assessment of the adult with a previous coarctation repair

L Swan¹, S Goyal², C Hsia², S Hechter², G Webb², M A Gatzoulis¹

¹ Adult Congenital Heart Programme, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK
² Toronto Congenital Cardiac Centre for Adults, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Canada

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Lorna Swan, Toronto Congenital Cardiac Centre for Adults, 12th floor Eaton North, Toronto General Hospital, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada;
lornaswan{at}yahoo.com

Background: The role of exercise testing in the follow up of adults with a coarctation repair is unclear. Exercise induced systolic hypertension has been advocated as an indication for further investigation; however, the value of exercise testing in this role has been questioned, especially in paediatric populations.

Objective: To assess the value of resting and exercise blood pressure measurements in a cohort of adults with repaired coarctation.

Setting: Tertiary referral centre for adult congenital cardiac disease.

Patients: 56 patients (33 male, 23 female) with a previous coarctation repair, and 33 age matched controls.

Main outcome measures: Resting and exercise blood pressures, including arm–leg systolic blood pressure gradients; standard echocardiographic measurements of left ventricular mass, aortic root diameter, and repair site gradient.

Results: The coarctation cohort had higher resting upper limb blood pressures than the controls (systolic: 129.7 v 120.7 mm Hg, p = 0.014; diastolic: 76.8 v 72.2 mm Hg, p = 0.02). Mean resting arm–leg systolic blood pressure gradient was also higher, at 3.6 v -2.2 mm Hg, p = 0.027. However, there were no differences between the peak exercise systolic blood pressures of the two groups. Peak exercise systolic blood pressure did not correlate with resting arm–leg blood pressure gradient (r = 0.24, p = 0.13) or with repair site gradient (r = 0.14, p = 0.39). Resting upper limb systolic blood pressure and resting arm–leg systolic blood pressure gradient were related to repair site gradient (r = 0.33, p = 0.03, and r = 0.47, p = 0.002).

Conclusions: Measurements of upper limb blood pressure during exercise are of limited value in the assessment of the post-repair coarctation patient. If routine exercise testing is to be advocated in this population it must be for another indication.

Keywords: coarctation; blood pressure; exercise

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Hager, A., Kanz, S., Kaemmerer, H., Schreiber, C., Hess, J. (2007). Coarctation Long-term Assessment (COALA): Significance of arterial hypertension in a cohort of 404 patients up to 27 years after surgical repair of isolated coarctation of the aorta, even in the absence of restenosis and prosthetic material. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 134: 738-745 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Ou, P., Mousseaux, E., Celermajer, D. S., Pedroni, E., Vouhe, P., Sidi, D., Bonnet, D. (2006). Aortic arch shape deformation after coarctation surgery: effect on blood pressure response.. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 132: 1105-1111 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Young, C E, Sandor, G G S, Potts, J E (2006). Exercise does not cause an arm-leg blood pressure gradient in healthy children. Heart 92: 1692-1693 [Full Text]  
• Chessa, M., Carrozza, M., Butera, G., Piazza, L., Negura, D. G., Bussadori, C., Bossone, E., Giamberti, A., Carminati, M. (2005). Results and mid-long-term follow-up of stent implantation for native and recurrent coarctation of the aorta. Eur Heart J 26: 2728-2732 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Vriend, J W J, de Groot, E, Bouma, B J, Hrudova, J, Kastelein, J J P, Tijssen, J G P, Mulder, B J M (2005). Carotid intima-media thickness in post-coarctectomy patients with exercise induced hypertension. Heart 91: 962-963 [Full Text]  
• Hauser, M (2003). Exercise blood pressure in congenital heart disease and in patients after coarctation repair. Heart 89: 125-126 [Full Text]