CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE

Does the use of a syncope diagnostic protocol improve the investigation and management of syncope?

D J Farwell, A N Sulke

Department of Cardiology, Eastbourne District General Hospital, East Sussex, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr A N Sulke
Department of Cardiology, Eastbourne District General Hospital, King’s Drive, Eastbourne, East Sussex, UK; djfarwell{at}bigfoot.com

Objectives: To assess the efficacy of a protocol designed to improve the diagnosis and management of syncope.

Design: Prospective outcome analysis of all patients presenting with syncope for the 12 month period from 1 November 2000 to 31 October 2001, compared with a retrospective study of all patients presenting with syncope during the calendar year 1998. Use of the protocol commenced in September 2000.

Setting: Eastbourne District General Hospital, serving a population of approximately 250 000; 25% are older than 65 years.

Subjects: 421 consecutive patients presenting with syncope, investigated prospectively in January 2000 and compared with 660 patients retrospectively analysed for the calendar year 1998.

Results: In 1998, 71% of patients with syncope received a diagnostic classification. In January 2000 there was an appropriate diagnostic hypothesis for every patient. Ultimately a diagnosis was made for 78% of patients according to accepted criteria (p = 0.003). Use of tests with the highest diagnostic effectiveness, such as tilt tests, increased in 2001 and many tests were used more appropriately (such as echocardiography). However, non-diagnostic tests were still frequently used (such as chest radiography, electroencephalography, and carotid Doppler studies). Costs of investigation and hospital stay rose from £611 to £1384 (874 to 1980) per patient (p < 0.001), with cost per diagnosis increasing from £870 (1245) in 1998 to £1949 (2790) (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The syncope protocol improved diagnosis and the use of appropriate investigations. However, significant inappropriate investigation and hospital admission still occurred. The protocol allowed reliable triage of syncopal patients into high and low risk groups.

Keywords: protocol; diagnosis; management; syncope

Abbreviations: CSM, carotid sinus massage; ELR, external loop recorder; ILR, implantable loop recorder

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Mendu, M. L., McAvay, G., Lampert, R., Stoehr, J., Tinetti, M. E. (2009). Yield of Diagnostic Tests in Evaluating Syncopal Episodes in Older Patients. Arch Intern Med 169: 1299-1305 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Pezawas, T, Stix, G, Kastner, J, Schneider, B, Wolzt, M, Schmidinger, H (2008). Implantable loop recorder in unexplained syncope: classification, mechanism, transient loss of consciousness and role of major depressive disorder in patients with and without structural heart disease. Heart 94: e17-e17 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Tan, M. P., Parry, S. W. (2008). Vasovagal syncope in the older patient.. J Am Coll Cardiol 51: 599-606 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Brignole, M. (2007). Diagnosis and treatment of syncope. Heart 93: 130-136 [Full Text]  
• Petkar, S., Cooper, P., Fitzpatrick, A. P (2006). How to avoid a misdiagnosis in patients presenting with transient loss of consciousness.. Postgrad. Med. J. 82: 630-641 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Brignole, M., Ungar, A., Bartoletti, A., Ponassi, I., Lagi, A., Mussi, C., Ribani, M. A., Tava, G., Disertori, M., Quartieri, F., Alboni, P., Raviele, A., Ammirati, F., Scivales, A., De Santo, T., for the Evaluation of Guidelines in Syncope Study, (2006). Standardized-care pathway vs. usual management of syncope patients presenting as emergencies at general hospitals.. Europace 8: 644-650 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Farwell, D. J., Freemantle, N., Sulke, N. (2006). The clinical impact of implantable loop recorders in patients with syncope. Eur Heart J 27: 351-356 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Baron-Esquivias, G., Moreno, S. G., Martinez, A., Pedrote, A., Vazquez, F., Granados, C., Bollain, E., Lage, E., de la Llera, L. D., Rodriguez, M. J., Errazquin, F., Burgos, J. (2006). Cost of diagnosis and treatment of syncope in patients admitted to a cardiology unit. Europace 8: 122-127 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Brignole, M., Menozzi, C., Bartoletti, A., Giada, F., Lagi, A., Ungar, A., Ponassi, I., Mussi, C., Maggi, R., Re, G., Furlan, R., Rovelli, G., Ponzi, P., Scivales, A., for the Evaluation of Guidelines in Syncope Study, (2006). A new management of syncope: prospective systematic guideline-based evaluation of patients referred urgently to general hospitals. Eur Heart J 27: 76-82 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Shen, W. K., Decker, W. W., Smars, P. A., Goyal, D. G., Walker, A. E., Hodge, D. O., Trusty, J. M., Brekke, K. M., Jahangir, A., Brady, P. A., Munger, T. M., Gersh, B. J., Hammill, S. C., Frye, R. L. (2004). Syncope Evaluation in the Emergency Department Study (SEEDS): A Multidisciplinary Approach to Syncope Management. Circulation 110: 3636-3645 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• (2004). Guidelines on Management (diagnosis and treatment) of syncope - update 2004: The Task Force on Syncope, European Society of Cardiology. Europace 6: 467-537 [Full Text]