© 2004 by BMJ Publishing Group & British Cardiac Society
CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE
Can we define patients with no chance of survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest?
1 Division of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden
2 Division of Cardiology, South Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
3 Division of Anaesthesiology, Malmö University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
4 Surgical Department, Norrlands University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Johan Herlitz
Division of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, S-413 45 Göteborg Sweden; johan.herlitz{at}hjl.gu.se
Objective: To evaluate whether subgroups of patients with no chance of survival can be defined among patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Patients: Patients in the Swedish cardiac arrest registry who fulfilled the following criteria were surveyed: cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was attempted; the arrest was not crew witnessed; and patients were found in a non-shockable rhythm.
Setting: Various ambulance organisations in Sweden.
Design: Prospective observational study.
Results: Among the 16 712 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria, the following factors were independently associated with a lower chance of survival one month after cardiac arrest: no bystander CPR; non-witnessed cardiac arrest; cardiac arrest occurring at home; increasing interval between call for and arrival of the ambulance; and increasing age. When these factors were considered simultaneously two groups with no survivors were defined. In both groups patients were found in a non-shockable rhythm, no bystander CPR was attempted, the arrest was non-witnessed, the arrest took place at home. In one group the interval between call for and arrival of ambulance exceeded 12 minutes. In the other group patients were older than 80 years and the interval between call for and arrival of the ambulance exceeded eight minutes.
Conclusion: Among patients who had an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and were found in a non-shockable rhythm the following factors were associated with a low chance of survival: no bystander CPR, non-witnessed cardiac arrest, the arrest took place at home, increasing interval between call for and arrival of ambulance, and increasing age. When these factors were considered simultaneously, groups with no survivors could be defined. In such groups the ambulance crew may refrain from starting CPR.
Keywords: cardiac arrest; prognosis; out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Sasson, C., Hegg, A. J., Macy, M., Park, A., Kellermann, A., McNally, B., for the CARES Surveillance Group,
(2008). Prehospital Termination of Resuscitation in Cases of Refractory Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. JAMA
300: 1432-1438
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Hulme, J.
(2006). Monitoring the injured patient. Trauma
8: 85-93
[Abstract] -
Conroy, S. P, Luxton, T., Dingwall, R., Harwood, R. H, Gladman, J. R F
(2006). Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in continuing care settings: time for a rethink?. BMJ
332: 479-482
[Full Text] -
Marcovitch, H.
(2004). What's new this month in BMJ Journals. BMJ
329: 1208-1208
[Full Text] -
Weston, C F M
(2004). Pre-hospital resuscitation: breathing life into a stale subject. Heart
90: 1107-1109
[Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
