Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Heart 2004;90:324-327; doi:10.1136/hrt.2003.015305
Copyright © 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Cardiovascular Society
Heart 2004;90:324-327
© 2004 by BMJ Publishing Group & British Cardiac Society

BASIC RESEARCH

Response of very small (2 mm) porcine coronary arteries to balloon angioplasty and stent implantation

A C Morton, N D Arnold, D C Crossman, J Gunn

Cardiovascular Research Group, Division of Clinical Sciences (Northern General Hospital), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr J Gunn
Cardiovascular Research Group, Division of Clinical Sciences (Northern General Hospital), University of Sheffield, Clinical Sciences Building, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield S5 7AU, UK; J.Gunn{at}Sheffield.ac.uk

Objective: To investigate the response of very small coronary arteries to stent deployment and balloon angioplasty.

Setting: Normal porcine coronary arteries.

Methods: 24 pigs underwent intervention to two main coronary arteries, in segments 2.0 mm in diameter, with balloons whose diameter was 2.5 mm at standard pressure. Twelve arteries received a BiodivYsio small vessel (SV) stent; 12 an NIR SV stent; 12 standard BiodivYsio stent, and 12 balloon only. The arteries were harvested at 28 days, fixed, embedded in plastic, and cut and ground in cross section. The injury score and histomorphometry were assessed.

Results: The BiodivYsio SV stent was associated with 20% less injury (p = 0.16), a 30% larger lumen (p = 0.13), and a 25% smaller neointima (p = 0.03) than the NIR SV stent, despite identical oversize. The standard BiodivYsio stent exhibited less recoil but 29% greater injury (p = 0.01), 59% more neointima (p = 0.00), and 18% less lumen (p = 0.27) than the BiodivYsio SV. Of all interventions, balloon only was associated with little injury, little neointima, major vessel shrinkage, and the largest lumen.

Conclusion: Despite uniform oversize dilatation, both injury and response varied widely in very small porcine coronary arteries, depending on whether a stent or balloon was used, the stent design, and the number and/or thickness of struts. The response to different stent designs is considerable and is related to the degree of injury.

Keywords: Stent; geometry; coronary artery; restenosis

Abbreviations: BENESTENT II, Belgian Netherlands stent II; POBA, plain old balloon angioplasty; SOPHOS, study of phosphorylcholine coating on stents; SV, small vessel


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Russo, R. J, Silva, P. D, Yeager, M. (2007). Coronary artery overexpansion increases neointimal hyperplasia after stent placement in a porcine model. Heart 93: 1609-1615 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Agostoni, P., Biondi-Zoccai, G. G.L., Gasparini, G. L., Anselmi, M., Morando, G., Turri, M., Abbate, A., McFadden, E. P., Vassanelli, C., Zardini, P., Colombo, A., Serruys, P. W. (2005). Is bare-metal stenting superior to balloon angioplasty for small vessel coronary artery disease? Evidence from a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Eur Heart J 26: 881-889 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.