HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Desmet, W J
Right arrow Articles by Van de Werf, F J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Desmet, W J
Right arrow Articles by Van de Werf, F J
Heart 2004;90:887-892
© 2004 by BMJ Publishing Group & British Cardiac Society


CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE

Relation between different methods for analysing ST segment deviation and infarct size as assessed by positron emission tomography

W J Desmet1, L V Mesotten2, A F Maes2, H P Heidbüchel1, L A Mortelmans2, F J Van de Werf1

1 Department of Cardiology, UH Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
2 Department of Nuclear Medicine, UH Gasthuisberg

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Walter Desmet
Department of Cardiology, UH Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; Walter.Desmet{at}uz.kuleuven.ac.be

Objective: To study the relation between resolution of ST segment deviation and infarct size using positron emission tomography.

Methods: 45 patients with ST segment elevation acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolysis or percutaneous coronary intervention were studied prospectively. An ECG was taken before and at (mean (SD)) 100 (45) min after reperfusion therapy. ECGs were analysed by three methods. Residual ST segment deviation, obtained from the ECG immediately after completion of reperfusion therapy, was defined by summation for each of the three methods. Relative resolution of ST segment deviation was defined as the absolute resolution divided by the ST segment deviation score at baseline x 100 (%). After 29 (14) hours, myocardial blood flow was measured with 13NH3. For each patient, the regions with a myocardial blood flow < 80% of normally perfused myocardium ( = hypoperfusion) and < 50% ( = no reflow) were automatically delineated.

Results: Substantial differences were found between different ECG analysis methods. There were moderate correlations between the area with myocardial hypoperfusion and ST segment deviation scores at baseline and after reperfusion therapy. After reperfusion therapy, residual ST segment deviation in the single lead with maximum ST segment deviation was as good at discriminating between tertiles of myocardial damage as summed ST segment elevation. Relative ST segment resolution did not discriminate between different degrees of myocardial damage.

Conclusions: In the individual patient, residual ST segment deviation after reperfusion in the single lead with maximum ST segment deviation is at least as good as summed ST elevation in predicting final myocardial damage.


Abbreviations: PET, positron emission tomography; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; STD, ST deviation; STE, ST elevation; STEMI, ST segment elevation acute myocardial infarction; TIMI, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction

Keywords: ST segment; myocardial reperfusion; myocardial infarction; positron emission tomography




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HeartHome page
C. J. Terkelsen and H. R. Andersen
Value of ST-resolution analysis in the era of primary percutaneous coronary intervention
Heart, January 1, 2008; 94(1): 13 - 15.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
G De Luca, H Suryapranata, J P Ottervanger, J C A Hoorntje, A T M Gosselink, J-H Dambrink, M-J de Boer, and A W J v. Hof
Postprocedural single-lead ST-segment deviation and long-term mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary angioplasty
Heart, January 1, 2008; 94(1): 44 - 47.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
L A Pierard
ST elevation after myocardial infarction: what does it mean?
Heart, November 1, 2007; 93(11): 1329 - 1330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
L. Galiuto, S. Barchetta, S. Paladini, G. Lanza, A. G Rebuzzi, M. Marzilli, and F. Crea
Functional and structural correlates of persistent ST elevation after acute myocardial infarction successfully treated by percutaneous coronary intervention
Heart, November 1, 2007; 93(11): 1376 - 1380.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Cardiovascular Society