HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Published Online First: 29 March 2005. doi:10.1136/hrt.2004.048512
Heart 2005;91:1280-1283
Copyright © 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Cardiovascular Society

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
hrt.2004.048512v1
91/10/1280    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cunningham, A D
Right arrow Articles by Rickards, A F
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cunningham, A D
Right arrow Articles by Rickards, A F

CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE

The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: postcode prescribing in the UK 1998–2002

A D Cunningham1, C J Plummer2, J M McComb2, S W Lord, M W Cunningham1, J-M Toussaint3, A F Rickards1

1 National Pacemaker and ICD Database, UK
2 Department of Cardiology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
3 International Health Market Trends, France

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr David Cunningham
PO Box 9205, Bridge of Weir, Renfrewshire PA11 3DZ, UK; david{at}ccad.nildram.co.uk

Objective: To determine the rate of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation across the UK during the period 1998 to 2002.

Design: Observational self reporting with cross checking.

Setting: All ICD implanting centres coordinated by the National Pacemaker and ICD Database.

Patients: Every patient receiving an ICD in the UK from 1998 to 2002.

Main outcome measures: Date of implantation and postcode of each ICD recipient during the study period.

Results: ICD implantation increased in the UK in the five year period studied but fell far short of the European average and national targets. Implantation rates varied greatly by region.

Conclusions: The low rate of ICD implantation in the UK and the disparity between regions require further study to determine the barriers to this evidence based treatment.


Keywords: ICD; implantable cardioverter-defibrillator




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EuropaceHome page
D. Chase, P. J. Roderick, H. Burnley, P. J. Gallagher, P. R. Roberts, and J. M. Morgan
Is there unmet need for implantable cardioverter defibrillators? Findings from a post-mortem series of sudden cardiac death
Europace, June 1, 2008; 10(6): 741 - 746.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
N Boon, M Norell, J Hall, K Jennings, L Penny, C Wilson, J Chambers, and R Weston
National variations in the provision of cardiac services in the United Kingdom: second report of the British Cardiac Society Working Group, 2005
Heart, July 1, 2006; 92(7): 873 - 878.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
C C Lang
Regional variation in ICD implantation rates: the shocking truth?
Heart, October 1, 2005; 91(10): 1251 - 1253.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Cardiovascular Society