HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Heart 2005;91:1289-1293; doi:10.1136/hrt.2004.041236
Copyright © 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Cardiovascular Society

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zbinden, R
Right arrow Articles by Seiler, C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zbinden, R
Right arrow Articles by Seiler, C

CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE

Influence of diabetes mellitus on coronary collateral flow: an answer to an old controversy

R Zbinden, S Zbinden, M Billinger, S Windecker, B Meier, C Seiler

Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor Christian Seiler
University Hospital Bern, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland; christian.seiler{at}insel.ch

Objectives: To determine the influence of diabetes mellitus on coronary collateral flow by accurate means of collateral flow measurement in a large population with variable degrees of coronary artery disease.

Methods: 200 patients (mean (SD) age 64 (9) years; 100 diabetic and 100 non-diabetic) were enrolled in the study. Coronary collateral flow was assessed in 174 stenotic and in 26 angiographically normal vessels with a pressure guidewire (n = 131), Doppler guidewire (n = 36), or both (n = 33) to calculate pressure or flow velocity derived collateral flow index (CFI). Diabetic patients were perfectly matched with a non-diabetic control group for clinical, haemodynamic, and angiographic parameters.

Results: CFI did not differ between the diabetic and the non-diabetic patients (0.21 (0.12) v 0.19 (0.13), not significant). Likewise, CFI did not differ when only angiographically normal vessels (0.20 (0.09) v 0.15 (0.08), not significant) or chronic total coronary occlusions (0.30 (0.14) v 0.30 (0.17), not significant) were compared. Fewer patients in the diabetic group tended to have angina pectoris during the one minute vessel occlusion (60 diabetic v 69 non-diabetic patients, p = 0.15).

Conclusion: Quantitatively measured coronary CFI did not differ between diabetic and non-diabetic patients with stable coronary artery disease.


Abbreviations: CAD, coronary artery disease; CFI, collateral flow index; CFIp, pressure derived collateral flow index; CFIv, velocity derived collateral flow index; CVP, central venous pressure; DM, diabetes mellitus; Pao, mean aortic pressure; Poccl, distal coronary pressure at the end of a one minute balloon occlusion

Keywords: collateral circulation; diabetes mellitus; angiogenesis; collateral flow index




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
T. Kinnaird, E. Stabile, S. Zbinden, M.-S. Burnett, and S. E. Epstein
Cardiovascular risk factors impair native collateral development and may impair efficacy of therapeutic interventions
Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2008; 78(2): 257 - 264.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Cardiovascular Society