Heart 2006;92:1571-1576
CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE
Magnitude and consequences of undertreatment of high-risk patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: insights from the DESCARTES Registry
1 Department of Cardiology of Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
2 Department of Cardiology of Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
3 Department of Cardiology of Hospital Joan XXIII, Tarragon, Spain
4 Department of Cardiology of Hospital Clínico, Madrid, Spain
5 Institut Municipal dInvestigació Mèdica and Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Correspondence to:
Dr Magda Heras
ICMCV Department of Cardiology, Villarroel, 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain; mheras{at}clinic.ub.es
Objective: To analyse intensity of treatment of high-risk patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTEACS) included in the DESCARTES (Descripción del Estado de los Sindromes Coronarios Agudos en un Registro Temporal Español) registry.
Patients and setting: Patients with NSTEACS (n = 1877) admitted to 45 randomly selected Spanish hospitals in April and May 2002 were studied.
Design: Patients with ST segment depression and troponin rise were considered high risk (n = 478) and were compared with non-high risk patients (n = 1399).
Results: 46.9% of high-risk patients versus 39.5% of non-high-risk patients underwent angiography (p = 0.005), 23.2% versus 18.8% (p = 0.038) underwent percutaneous revascularisation, and 24.9% versus 7.4% (p < 0.001) were given glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor. In-hospital and six-month mortality were 7.5% versus 1.1% and 17% versus 4.6% (p < 0.001), respectively. A treatment score (
4, 23 and < 2) was defined according to the number of class I interventions recommended in clinical guidelines: aspirin, clopidogrel, ß blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, statins and revascularisation. Independent predictors of six-month mortality were age (odds ratio (OR) 1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04 to 1.10, p < 0.001), diabetes (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.14 to 3.22, p = 0.014), previous cardiovascular disease (OR 4.17, 95% CI 1.63 to 10.68, p = 0.003), high risk (OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.30 to 3.71, p = 0.003) and treatment score < 2 versus
4 (OR 2.87, 95% CI 1.27 to 6.52, p = 0.012).
Conclusions: Class I recommended treatments were underused in high-risk patients in the DESCARTES registry. This undertreatment was an independent predictor of death of patients with an acute coronary syndrome.
Abbreviations: ACE, angiotensin-converting enzyme; CRUSADE, Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse Outcomes With Early Implementation of the ACC/AHA Guidelines; DESCARTES, Descripción del Estado de los Sindromes Coronarios Agudos en un Registro Temporal Español; FRISC II, FRagmin and Fast Revascularisation during InStability in Coronary artery disease; GRACE, Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events; NSTEACS, non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; PEPA, Proyecto de Estudio del Pronostico de la Angina
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Halim, S. A., Mulgund, J., Chen, A. Y., Roe, M. T., Peterson, E. D., Gibler, W. B., Ohman, E. M., Newby, L. K.
(2009). Use of Guidelines-Recommended Management and Outcomes Among Women and Men With Low-Level Troponin Elevation: Insights From CRUSADE. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes
2: 199-206
[Abstract] [Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
