Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 8 May 2007. doi:10.1136/hrt.2006.110460
Heart 2007;93:1204-1212
Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Cardiovascular Society

HEART FAILURE AND CARDIOMYOPATHY

Assessment of intravascular and extravascular mechanisms of myocardial perfusion abnormalities in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy by myocardial contrast echocardiography

Osama I I Soliman1, Paul Knaapen2, Marcel L Geleijnse1, Pieter A Dijkmans3, Ashraf M Anwar1, Attila Nemes1, Michelle Michels1, Wim B Vletter1, Adriaan A Lammertsma2, Folkert J ten Cate1

1 Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
2 Department of Nuclear Medicine and Positron Emission Tomography, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
3 Department of Cardiology and Institute of Cardiovascular Research, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Dr F J ten Cate, Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcentre, Erasmus Medical Centre Rotterdam, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Room Ba304, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; f.j.tencate{at}erasmusmc.nl

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To assess mechanisms of myocardial perfusion impairment in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM).

Methods: Fourteen patients with obstructive HCM (mean (SD) age 53 (10) years, 11 men) underwent intravenous adenosine myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE), positron emission tomography (PET) and cardiac catheterisation. Fourteen healthy volunteers (mean age 31 (4) years, 11 men) served as controls. Relative myocardial blood volume (rBV), exchange flow velocity (ß), myocardial blood flow (MBF), MBF reserve (MFR) and endocardial-to-subepicardial (endo-to-epi) MBF ratio were measured from the steady state and contrast replenishment time–intensity curves.

Results: Patients with HCM had lower rest MBF (for LVRPP-corrected)—mean (SD) (0.92 (0.12) vs 1.13 (0.25) ml/min/g, p<0.01)—and hyperaemic MBF—(2.56 (0.49) vs 4.34 (0.78) ml/min/g, p<0.01) than controls. Resting rBV was lower in patients with HCM (0.094 (0.016) vs 0.138 (0.014) ml/ml), and during hyperaemia (0.104 (0.018) ml/ml vs 0.185 (0.024) ml/ml) (all p<0.001) than in controls. ß tended to be higher in HCM at rest (9.4 (4.6) vs 7.7 (4.2) ml/min) and during hyperaemia (25.8 (6.4) vs 23.1 (6.2) ml/min) than in controls. Septal endo-to-epi MBF decreased during hyperaemia (0.86 (0.15) to 0.64 (0.18), p<0.01). rBV was inversely correlated with left ventricular (LV) mass index (p<0.05). Both hyperaemic and endo-to-epi MBF were inversely correlated with LV end-diastolic pressure, LV mass index, and LV outflow tract pressure gradient (all p<0.05). MCE-derived MBF correlated well with PET at rest (r = 0.84) and hyperaemia (r = 0.87) (all p<0.001).

Conclusions: In patients with HCM, LV end-diastolic pressure, LV outflow tract pressure gradient, and LV mass index are independent predictors of rBV and hyperaemic MBF.

Abbreviations: endo-to-epi, endocardial-to-subepicardial; HCM, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; LV, left ventricular; LVEDP, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure; LVMI, left ventricular mass index; LVOTG, left ventricular outflow tract gradient; LVRPP, left ventricular rate–pressure product; MBF, myocardial blood flow; MCE, myocardial contrast echocardiography; MFR, myocardial flow reserve; PET, positron emission tomography; rBV, relative blood volume; ROI, region of interest; RPP, rate–pressure product

Keywords: myocardial perfusion; hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy; myocardial contrast echocardiography; positron emission tomography


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Abdelmoneim, S S, Dhoble, A, Bernier, M, Moir, S, Hagen, M E, Ness, S A C, Abdel-Kader, S S, Pellikka, P A, Mulvagh, S L (2009). Absolute myocardial blood flow determination using real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography during adenosine stress: comparison with single-photon emission computed tomography. Heart 95: 1662-1668 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Jaber, W A, Yang, E H, Nishimura, R A, Sorajja, P, Rihal, C S, Elesber, A, Eeckhout, E, Lerman, A (2009). Immediate improvement in coronary flow reserve after alcohol septal ablation in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. Heart 95: 564-569 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Aggeli, C, Giannopoulos, G, Roussakis, G, Christoforatou, E, Marinos, G, Toli, C, Pitsavos, C, Stefanadis, C (2008). Safety of myocardial flash-contrast echocardiography in combination with dobutamine stress testing for the detection of ischaemia in 5250 studies. Heart 94: 1571-1577 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Knaapen, P., Germans, T., Camici, P. G., Rimoldi, O. E., ten Cate, F. J., ten Berg, J. M., Dijkmans, P. A., Boellaard, R., van Dockum, W. G., Gotte, M. J. W., Twisk, J. W. R., van Rossum, A. C., Lammertsma, A. A., Visser, F. C. (2008). Determinants of coronary microvascular dysfunction in symptomatic hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 294: H986-H993 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.