FEATURED EDITORIAL
Where does the Occluded Artery Trial leave the late open artery hypothesis?
1 Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, Florida, USA
2 New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
Correspondence to:
Dr G A Lamas, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Cardiology Research – Butler Building, 4300 Alton Road, Miami Beach FL 33140, USA; most95{at}aol.com
As of April 2007 the early open artery hypothesis is alive and well, but the late open artery hypothesis is adrift. For the foreseeable future, stable patients with persistent occlusion of the infarct artery late after myocardial infarction, and without severe ischaemia or uncontrollable angina, should be managed initially with optimal medical treatment alone, and not with percutaneous coronary intervention. Efforts should focus on establishing reperfusion earlier, including reducing the time to patient presentation.
Abbreviations: EF, ejection fraction; LV, left ventricular; MI, myocardial infarction; OAT, Occluded Artery Trial; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention
Keywords: open artery hypothesis; Occluded Artery Trial
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
