EDITORIALS
Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography for the detection of coronary stenosis: do we really have to focus on "stenoses"?
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Eberhard-Karls-University, Tuebingen, Germany
Correspondence to:
Dr C Burgstahler, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, Otfried-Mueller-Strasse 10, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany; christof.burgstahler{at}med.uni-tuebingen.de
See article on page 1381
Abbreviations: MSCT, multisclice computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging
Keywords: coronary angiography; magnetic resonance imaging; multisclice computed tomography; non-invasive; stress perfusion
Relevant Article
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Heart 2007 93: 1381-1385.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Vogel, R, Indermuhle, A, Meier, P, Seiler, C
(2009). Quantitative stress echocardiography in coronary artery disease using contrast-based myocardial blood flow measurements: prospective comparison with coronary angiography. Heart
95: 377-384
[Abstract] [Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
