Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 11 August 2006. doi:10.1136/hrt.2006.088146
Heart 2007;93:221-225
Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Cardiovascular Society

CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY

Outcome after redo coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy and viable myocardium

V Rizzello1, D Poldermans1, A F L Schinkel1, E Biagini1, E Boersma1, A Elhendy1, F B Sozzi1, A Palazzuoli1, A Maat1, F Crea2, J J Bax3

1 Department of Cardiology, Thorax Center, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
2 The Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
3 The Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

Correspondence to:
Dr D Poldermans
Department of Cardiology, Thorax Center Room Ba 300, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; d.poldermans{at}erasmusmc.nl

ABSTRACT

Background: Repeat coronary artery bypass grafting (redo-CABG) in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy is associated with high perioperative risk and worse long-term outcome compared with patients undergoing their first CABG.

Objective: To assess whether patients with viable myocardium undergoing redo-CABG have a better outcome.

Methods: 18 patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy underwent redo-CABG and 34 underwent their first CABG; all had substantial viability (>=25% of the left ventricle) on dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and heart failure symptoms were assessed before and 9–12 months after revascularisation. Cardiac event rate was assessed during the follow-up period (median 4 years, 25–75th centile 2.8–4.9 years).

Results: The extent of viable myocardium on DSE was comparable in the two groups (11.3 (3.9) segments in patients who underwent redo-CABG v 12.8 (3.0) in patients who underwent their first CABG; p = NS). LVEF improved from 32% (9%) to 39% (12%); p = 0.01, in patients who underwent redo-CABG and from 30% (7%) to 36% (7%); p<0.01, in those who underwent their first CABG; New York Heart Association class improved from 2.5 (1.1) to 1.9 (0.8); p = 0.03, and from 2.7 (1.0) to 1.8 (0.70); p<0.01, respectively. In patients who underwent redo-CABG, the perioperative mortality was 0, post-surgery inotropic support was needed in 11% of the patients and mid-term (4-year) survival was 100%, with a total event rate of 28%. All these variables were not statistically different from patients who underwent their first CABG (p = 0.50, 0.90, 0.08 and 0.81, respectively).

Conclusion: Patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy and substantial viability undergoing redo-CABG benefit from revascularisation in terms of improvement in LVEF, heart failure symptoms, angina and mid-term prognosis.

Abbreviations: CCS, Canadian Cardiovascular Society; DSE, dobutamine stress echocardiography; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; NYHA, New York Heart Association; redo-CABG, repeat coronary artery bypass grafting


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Acampa, W., Petretta, M., Evangelista, L., Nappi, G., Luongo, L., Petretta, M. P., Cuocolo, A. (2008). Stress cardiac single-photon emission computed tomographic imaging late after coronary artery bypass surgery for risk stratification and estimation of time to cardiac events. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 136: 46-51 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Sicari, R., Nihoyannopoulos, P., Evangelista, A., Kasprzak, J., Lancellotti, P., Poldermans, D., Voigt, J.-U., Zamorano, J. L., on behalf of the European Association of Echocardi, (2008). Stress echocardiography expert consensus statement: European Association of Echocardiography (EAE) (a registered branch of the ESC). Eur J Echocardiogr 9: 415-437 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.