Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 29 November 2006. doi:10.1136/hrt.2006.102061
Heart 2007;93:688-693
Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Cardiovascular Society

CLINICAL TRIALS

Can atrial fibrillation with a coarse electrocardiographic appearance be treated with catheter ablation of the tricuspid valve–inferior vena cava isthmus? Results of a multicentre randomised controlled trial

Dhiraj Gupta1, Mark J Earley1, Guy A Haywood2, Laura Richmond1, Melissa Fitzgerald2, Pipin Kojodjojo3, Simon C Sporton1, Nicholas S Peters3, Paul Broadhurst4, Richard J Schilling1 Coarse AF Investigators

1 St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, UK
2 Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, UK
3 St Mary’s Hospital, London, UK
4 Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK

Correspondence to:
Dr R Schilling
Cardiac Research Department, 1st Floor, Dominion House, 60 Bartholomew Close, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, West Smithfield, London EC1A 7BE, UK; r.schilling{at}qmul.ac.uk

ABSTRACT

Objective: To see if strategy of ablating the tricuspid annulus–inferior vena cava isthmus (TV–IVC) is superior to electrical cardioversion to prevent recurrences in patients with coarse atrial fibrillation.

Design: Prospective randomised controlled multicentre study.

Setting: Four tertiary referral hospitals in the UK.

Patients: 57 patients with persistent coarse atrial fibrillation (irregular P waves >=0.15 mV in >=1 ECG lead).

Interventions: Patients were randomised to receive external cardioversion (group A, n = 30) or TV–IVC ablation +/– DC cardioversion (group B, n = 27).

Main outcome measures: Cardiac rhythm, scores on quality of life and symptom questionnaires were assessed at 4, 16 and 52 weeks after the procedure.

Results: 20 (67%) patients in group A and 19 (70%) patients in group B were in sinus rhythm immediately after their index procedure. At 4, 16 and 52 weeks, the number of patients in sinus rhythm were 5, 3 and 2 in group A and 3, 3 and 1 in group B (p = NS). The quality of life and symptom questionnaire scores were similar in the two groups at each period of follow-up, although they were significantly better for sinus rhythm than for atrial fibrillation at each follow-up visit.

Conclusions: As a first-line strategy, TV–IVC ablation offers no advantages over direct current cardioversion for the management of coarse atrial fibrillation.

Abbreviations: DCCV, direct current cardioversion; INR, International Normalised Ratio; QOL, quality of life; TV–IVC, tricuspid valve–inferior vena cava isthmus


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.