HEART REVIEW

Prognosis of stable angina pectoris: why we need larger population studies with higher endpoint resolution

Adam D Timmis¹, Gene Feder², Harry Hemingway³

¹ Cardiac Directorate, Barts and The London NHS Trust, London, UK
² Centre for Health Sciences, Barts and the London, Queen Mary’s School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK
³ Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London Medical School, London, UK

Correspondence to:
Professor A Timmis
Department of Cardiology, London Chest Hospital, Bonner Road, London E2 9JX, UK;adamtimmis{at}mac.com

The prognosis of angina was described as ""unhappy" by the Framingham investigators and as little different from that of 1-year survivors of acute myocardial infarction. Yet recent clinical trials now report that angina has a good prognosis with adverse outcomes reduced to "normal levels". These disparate prognostic assessments may not be incompatible, applying as they do to population cohorts (Framingham) and selected participants in clinical trials. Comparisons between studies are further complicated by the absence of agreed case definitions for stable angina (contrast this with acute coronary syndromes). Our recent data show that for patients with recent onset symptoms attending chest pain clinics, angina remains a high-risk diagnosis and although many patients receive symptomatic benefit from revascularisation, prognosis is usually unaffected. This leaves little room for complacency and, with angina the commonest initial manifestation of coronary artery disease, there is the opportunity for early detection, risk stratification and treatment to modify outcomes. Meanwhile, larger population-based studies are needed to define the patient journey from earliest presentation through the various syndrome transitions to coronary or noncardiac death in order to increase understanding of the aetiological and prognostic differences between the different coronary disease phenotypes.

Abbreviations: CHD, coronary heart disease; MI, myocardial infarction

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Hemingway, H. (2009). States, rates and traits: prognosis research and chronic stable angina. Heart 95: 439-440 [Full Text]  
• Sekhri, N., Feder, G. S, Junghans, C., Eldridge, S., Umaipalan, A., Madhu, R., Hemingway, H., Timmis, A. D (2008). Incremental prognostic value of the exercise electrocardiogram in the initial assessment of patients with suspected angina: cohort study. BMJ 337: a2240-a2240 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Schomig, A., Mehilli, J., de Waha, A., Seyfarth, M., Pache, J., Kastrati, A. (2008). A Meta-Analysis of 17 Randomized Trials of a Percutaneous Coronary Intervention-Based Strategy in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 52: 894-904 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Hemingway, H., Chen, R., Junghans, C., Timmis, A., Eldridge, S., Black, N., Shekelle, P., Feder, G. (2008). Appropriateness Criteria for Coronary Angiography in Angina: Reliability and Validity. ANN INTERN MED 149: 221-231 [Abstract] [Full Text]