Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Heart 2007;93:792-800; doi:10.1136/hrt.2006.093740
Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Cardiovascular Society

REVIEW

A quantitative estimate of bare-metal stenting compared with balloon angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction: angiographic measures in relation to clinical outcome

Tone Svilaas, Iwan C C van der Horst, Felix Zijlstra

Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
T Svilaas
Thoraxcenter, Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Postbus 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands; t.svilaas{at}thorax.umcg.nl

ABSTRACT

We performed a systematic review of all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) from the pre-drug-eluting-stent era comparing bare-metal stenting (BMS) with balloon angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) to examine coronary angiographic parameters of infarct-related vessel patency and to relate the angiographic measures to clinical outcome. The search was restricted to published RCTs in humans. 10 RCTs, (6192 patients) were analysed. Compared with balloon angioplasty, BMS was associated with reduced rates of reocclusion (6.7% vs 10.1%, OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.96, p = 0.03) and restenosis (23.9% vs 39.3%, OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.59, p<0.001), but not with reduced rates of subacute thrombosis (1.7% in both groups). BMS showed a reduction in target vessel revascularisation (TVR; 12.2% vs 19.2%, OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.69, p<0.001), but not in mortality (5.3% vs 5.1%) or reinfarction (3.9% vs 4%). The findings of this study support BMS placement in acute MI. The discrepancy between angiographic and clinical parameters has important implications for future studies investigating further technical improvements in mechanical reperfusion therapy.

Abbreviations: BMS, bare-metal stent; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; MI, myocardial infarction; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; PAMI, Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infraction; RCT, randomised controlled trial; TIMI, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction; TVR, target vessel revascularisation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Vlaar, P. J., de Smet, B. J. G. L., Zijlstra, F. (2007). DES or BMS in acute myocardial infarction?. Eur Heart J 28: 2693-2694 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.