VALVULAR HEART DISEASE

Impact of blood pressure on the Doppler echocardiographic assessment of severity of aortic stenosis

Stephen H Little, Kwan-Leung Chan, Ian G Burwash

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Correspondence to:
Dr I G Burwash
University of Ottawa Heart Institute, 40 Ruskin Street, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1Y 4W7; iburwash{at}ottawaheart.ca

Objective: To investigate the impact of blood pressure (BP) on the Doppler echocardiographic (Doppler-echo) evaluation of severity of aortic stenosis (AS).

Methods: Handgrip exercise or phenylephrine infusion was used to increase BP in 22 patients with AS. Indices of AS severity (mean pressure gradient (P_mean), aortic valve area (AVA), valve resistance, percentage left ventricular stroke work loss (% LVSW loss) and the energy loss coefficient (ELCo)) were measured at baseline, peak BP intervention and recovery.

Results: From baseline to peak intervention, mean (SD) BP increased (99 (8) vs 121 (10) mm Hg, p<0.001), systemic vascular resistance (SVR) increased (1294 (264) vs 1552 (372) dynexs/cm⁵, p<0.001) and mean (SD) transvalvular flow rate (Q_mean) decreased (323 (67) vs 306 (66) ml/s, p = 0.02). There was no change in P_mean (36 (13) vs 36 (14) mm Hg, p = NS). However, there was a decrease in AVA (1.15 (0.32) vs 1.09 (0.33) cm², p = 0.02) and ELCo (1.32 (0.40) vs 1.24 (0.42) cm², p = 0.04), and an increase in valve resistance (153 (63) vs 164 (74) dynexs/cm⁵, p = 0.02), suggesting a more severe valve stenosis. In contrast, % LVSW loss decreased (19.8 (6) vs 16.5 (6)%, p<0.001), suggesting a less severe valve stenosis. There was an inverse relationship between the change in mean BP and AVA (r = –0.34, p = 0.02); however, only the change in Q_mean was an independent predictor of the change in AVA (r = 0.81, p<0.001).

Conclusions: Acute BP elevation due to increased SVR can affect the Doppler-echo evaluation of AS severity. However, the impact of BP on the assessment of AS severity depends primarily on the associated change in Q_mean, rather than on an independent effect of SVR or arterial compliance, and can result in a valve appearing either more or less stenotic depending on the direction and magnitude of the change in Q_mean.

Abbreviations: AS, aortic stenosis; AVA, aortic valve area; BP, blood pressure; CO, cardiac output; Doppler-echo, Doppler echocardiography; EF, ejection fraction; ELCo, energy loss coefficient; LV, left ventricular; LVOT, left ventricular outflow tract; % LVSW loss, percentage left ventricular stroke work loss; P_max, maximum transvalvular pressure gradient; P_mean, mean transvalvular pressure gradient; Q_mean, mean transvalvular flow rate; SAC, systemic arterial compliance; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SV, stroke volume; SVR, systemic vascular resistance

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

WEB TOP 10
Heart 2007 93: 1023. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Assessment of aortic stenosis severity: check the valve but don’t forget the arteries!

Philippe Pibarot and Jean G Dumesnil
Heart 2007 93: 780-782. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Dumesnil, J. G., Pibarot, P., Carabello, B. (2009). Paradoxical low flow and/or low gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: implications for diagnosis and treatment. Eur Heart J 0: ehp361v1-ehp361 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Ennezat, P V, Marechaux, S, Iung, B, Chauvel, C, LeJemtel, T H, Pibarot, P (2009). Exercise testing and exercise stress echocardiography in asymptomatic aortic valve stenosis. Heart 95: 877-884 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Rahimtoola, S. H. (2009). The Year in Valvular Heart Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 53: 1894-1908 [Full Text]  
• Baumgartner, H., Hung, J., Bermejo, J., Chambers, J. B., Evangelista, A., Griffin, B. P., Iung, B., Otto, C. M., Pellikka, P. A., Quinones, M. (2009). Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice. Eur J Echocardiogr 10: 1-25 [Full Text]  
• Mascherbauer, J., Fuchs, C., Stoiber, M., Schima, H., Pernicka, E., Maurer, G., Baumgartner, H. (2008). Systemic pressure does not directly affect pressure gradient and valve area estimates in aortic stenosis in vitro. Eur Heart J 29: 2049-2057 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kaden, J. J., Haghi, D. (2008). Hypertension in aortic valve stenosis--a Trojan horse. Eur Heart J 29: 1934-1935 [Full Text]  
• Linhartova, K. (2008). Impact of blood pressure on the Doppler echocardiographic assessment of severity of aortic stenosis. Heart 94: 508-508 [Full Text]  
• Burwash, I G, Little, S H, Chan, K L (2008). The authors' reply. Heart 94: 508-508 [Full Text]  
• Pibarot, P., Dumesnil, J. G (2007). Assessment of aortic stenosis severity: check the valve but don't forget the arteries!. Heart 93: 780-782 [Full Text]  

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Impact of blood pressure change and hypertension on aortic stenosis

Katerina Linhartova

Online, 4 Oct 2007 [Full text]