Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 4 May 2007. doi:10.1136/hrt.2006.106369
Heart 2008;94:53-58
Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Cardiovascular Society

HEART FAILURE AND CARDIOMYOPATHY

Comparison of temporary bifocal right ventricular pacing and biventricular pacing for heart failure: evaluation by tissue Doppler imaging

R E Lane1, J Mayet1, N S Peters1, D W Davies1, A W C Chow1,2

1 Waller Cardiac Unit, International Centre for Circulatory Health, St Mary’s Hospital and Imperial College of Medicine, London, UK
2 The Heart Hospital, UCLH, Westmoreland Street, London, UK

Dr Anthony W C Chow, The Heart Hospital, 16–18 Westmoreland Street, London W1G 8PH, UK; anthony.chow{at}uclh.nhs.uk

ABSTRACT

Background: The complications and limitations of biventricular pacing largely relate to left ventricular (LV) pacing. An alternative approach was tested of simultaneously pacing the right ventricular (RV) apex and outflow tract (RVOT) or using bifocal right ventricular pacing (BRVP) to provide cardiac resynchronisation.

Methods: 21 consecutive patients with heart failure and severely impaired left ventricular function were studied. Ejection fraction and tissue Doppler data were collected at baseline, during BRVP, and during biventricular pacing, using a temporary pacing protocol.

Results: BRVP was achieved in all patients without complication. BRVP significantly reduced mean baseline intra-LV, inter-LV–RV, and global mechanical dyssynchrony from (mean (SD)) 71 (35) to 44 (18) ms, p = 0.003; 86 (42) to 57 (33) ms, p = 0.029; and 157 (67) to 101 (42) ms, p = 0.005, respectively. It increased the ejection fraction from 21 (8)% to 29 (7)%, p = 0.002. Compared with BRVP, reductions in intra-LV, inter-LV–RV, and global mechanical dyssynchrony were superior with biventricular pacing (31 (12) ms, p = 0.014; 36 (27) ms, p = 0.008; and 67 (34) ms, p = 0.01 compared with BRVP, respectively); improvements in ejection fraction were similar (26 (9)%, NS).

Conclusions: In patients with heart failure, superior mechanical resynchronisation is achieved with biventricular pacing compared with BRVP. BRVP may be useful when left ventricular lead placement is not possible.

Keywords: biventricular pacing; bifocal right ventricular pacing; ventricular dyssynchrony; tissue Doppler imaging


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Pacing in heart failure: how many leads and where?
S Serge Barold and Bengt Herwerg
Heart 2008 94: 10-12. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Barold, S S., Herwerg, B. (2008). Pacing in heart failure: how many leads and where?. Heart 94: 10-12 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.