Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 4 May 2007. doi:10.1136/hrt.2006.108399
Heart 2008;94:191-196
Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Cardiovascular Society

HEART RHYTHM DISORDERS AND PACEMAKERS

Digitalis: a dangerous drug in atrial fibrillation? An analysis of the SPORTIF III and V data

K Gjesdal1, J Feyzi2, S B Olsson3

1 Ullevål University Hospital, University of Oslo, Norway
2 Statistical Data Analysis Center, Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
3 Department of Cardiology, University of Lund, Sweden

Professor K Gjesdal, Ullevål University Hospital, 0407 Oslo, Norway; knut.gjesdal{at}medisin.uio.no

ABSTRACT

Objective: In heart failure, digitalis increases exercise capacity and reduces morbidity, but has no effect on survival. This raises the suspicion that the inotropic benefits of digitalis may be counteracted by serious adverse effects. Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) were studied to clarify this.

Design: In the Stroke Prevention using an ORal Thrombin Inhibitor in atrial Fibrillation (SPORTIF) III and V studies, 7329 patients with AF at moderate-to-high risk were randomised to preventive treatment of thromboembolism, either with warfarin or the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran. The survival of users and non-users of digitalis was investigated.

Results: At baseline, 53.4% of the study population used digitalis, and these patients had a higher mortality than non-users (255/3911 (6.5%) vs 141/3418 (4.1%), p<0.001; hazard ratio (HR) = 1.58 (95% CI 1.29 to 1.94)). Digitalis users also had more baseline risk factors. After multivariate risk factor adjustment, the increased mortality persisted (p<0.001; HR = 1.53 (95% CI 1.22 to 1.92 vs 1.23 to 1.92)).

Conclusions: The results suggest that digitalis, like other inotropic drugs, may increase mortality. This may be concealed in heart failure, but be revealed in patients with AF, who need the rate-reducing effect of digitalis, but do not benefit much from an increased inotropy. Cautious interpretation of the data is mandatory since the patients were not randomised with respect to digitalis use.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Assessing the safety of drugs through observational research
Ross J Simpson, Jr
Heart 2008 94: 129-130. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Testa, L, Bhindi, R, Banning, A P (2008). Digitalis: a dangerous drug in atrial fibrillation?. Heart 94: 1654-1654 [Full Text]  
  • Gjesdal, K, Feyzi, J, Olsson, S B (2008). The authors' reply:. Heart 94: 1654-1655 [Full Text]  
  • Simpson, R. J Jr (2008). Assessing the safety of drugs through observational research. Heart 94: 129-130 [Full Text]  

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Digitalis in atrial fibrillation: not the best friend nor the worst foe.
Luca Testa, et al.
Online, 19 Feb 2008 [Full text]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.