HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Published Online First: 17 June 2007. doi:10.1136/hrt.2006.104067
Heart 2008;94:498-501
Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Cardiovascular Society

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
hrt.2006.104067v1
94/4/498    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Imazio, M
Right arrow Articles by Trinchero, R
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Imazio, M
Right arrow Articles by Trinchero, R
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

PERICARDIAL DISEASE

Myopericarditis versus viral or idiopathic acute pericarditis

M Imazio, E Cecchi, B Demichelis, A Chinaglia, S Ierna, D Demarie, A Ghisio, F Pomari, R Belli, R Trinchero

Department of Cardiology, Maria Vittoria Hospital, Torino, Italy

Correspondence to:
Dr M Imazio, Cardiology Department, Maria Vittoria Hospital, Via Cibrario 72, 10141 Torino, Italy; massimo_imazio{at}yahoo.it

Objective: To investigate the relative incidence, clinical presentation and prognosis of myopericarditis among patients with idiopathic or viral acute pericarditis.

Design: Prospective observational clinical cohort study.

Setting: Two general hospitals from an urban area of 220 000 inhabitants.

Patients: 274 consecutive cases of idiopathic or viral acute pericarditis between January 2001 and June 2005.

Main outcome measures: Relative prevalence of myopericarditis. Clinical features at presentation including echocardiographic data (ejection fraction (EF), wall motion score index (WMSI)) and follow-up data at 12 months including complications, results of echocardiography, electrocardiography and treadmill testing.

Results: Myopericarditis was recorded in 40/274 (14.6%) consecutive patients. At presentation, the following clinical features were independently associated with myopericarditis: arrhythmias (odds ratio (OR) = 17.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.7 to 54.1; p<0.001), male gender (OR = 6.4, 95% CI 2.3 to 18.4; p = 0.01), age <40 years (OR = 6.1, 95% CI 2.2 to 16.9; p = 0.01), ST elevation (OR = 5.4, 95% CI 1.4 to 20.5; p = 0.013) and a recent febrile syndrome (OR = 2.8, 95% CI 1.1 to 7.7; p = 0.044). After 12 months’ follow-up an increase of EF (basal EF 49.6 (5.1)% vs 12-month EF 59.1 (4.6)%; p<0.001) and decrease of WMSI (basal WMSI 1.19 (0.27) vs 12-month WMSI 1.02 (0.09); p<0.001) were recorded in patients with myopericarditis, with a normalisation of echocardiography, electrocardiography and treadmill testing in 98% of cases. Use of heparin or other anticoagulants (OR = 1.1, 95% CI 0.3 to 3.5; p = 0.918) and myopericarditis (OR = 2.3, 95% CI 0.7 to 7.6; p = 0.187) was not associated with an increased risk of cardiac tamponade or recurrences.

Conclusions: Myopericarditis is relatively common and shows a benign evolution also in spontaneous cases not related to vaccination.



Related Article

Risk prediction in pericarditis: who to keep in hospital?
David H Spodick
Heart 2008 94: 398-399. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Cardiovascular Society