Heart 2009;95:1449-1454
Original articles
Cardiovascular physiologyDifferentiation of tricuspid regurgitation from constrictive pericarditis: novel criteria for diagnosis in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory
Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
Correspondence to Dr P Sorajja, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN 55906, USA; paul.sorajja{at}mayo.edu
Background: Severe tricuspid regurgitation, constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy can all present with signs and symptoms of right heart failure and similar haemodynamic findings of elevation and equalisation of diastolic pressures at catheterisation. Although catheterisation findings of enhancement of ventricular interaction are a reliable parameter to distinguish constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy, this also may be present in severe tricuspid regurgitation.
Objective: To identify unique haemodynamic parameters that differentiate severe tricuspid regurgitation from constrictive pericarditis.
Methods: Haemodynamic findings from simultaneous right and left heart catheterisation of 14 patients (age 59 years; men 71%) with documented severe tricuspid regurgitation (group I) were compared with those of 14 patients with surgically proven constrictive pericarditis (group II).
Results: Findings of elevated right atrial pressure, early rapid ventricular filling and expiratory equalisation of ventricular diastolic pressures were similar in both groups. Ventricular interdependence, assessed by interaction of left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) systolic pressures, was also present in both groups. Relative changes in LV and RV diastolic pressures during respiration reliably distinguished group I from group II. During inspiration, the difference between the LV and RV diastolic pressures widened in group I but narrowed in group II. The height and slope of the early rapid filling wave in RV pressure trace was accentuated during inspiration in group I but did not change in group II.
Conclusions: The haemodynamic findings at cardiac catheterisation in patients with severe, symptomatic tricuspid regurgitation are similar to those of constrictive pericarditis. Careful analysis of the relationship of the LV and RV diastolic pressures during respiration can help differentiate the two entities.
Relevant Article
- Is it primarily tricuspid regurgitation, constriction or restriction?
- Lynne Williams and Michael Frenneaux
Heart 2009 95: 1380-1381.[Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Williams, L., Frenneaux, M.
(2009). Is it primarily tricuspid regurgitation, constriction or restriction?. Heart
95: 1380-1381
[Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
