Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 6 July 2009. doi:10.1136/hrt.2009.169268
Heart 2009;95:1662-1668
Copyright © 2009 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Cardiovascular Society

Original articles

Cardiac imaging and non-invasive testing

Absolute myocardial blood flow determination using real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography during adenosine stress: comparison with single-photon emission computed tomography

S S Abdelmoneim1, A Dhoble1, M Bernier1, S Moir1, M E Hagen1, S A C Ness1, S S Abdel-Kader2, P A Pellikka1, S L Mulvagh1

1 Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
2 Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt

Correspondence to Dr Sharon L Mulvagh, Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; smulvagh{at}mayo.edu

Objective: To assess the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE)-derived absolute myocardial blood flow for detection of myocardial perfusion abnormalities compared with simultaneous technetium 99 m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT).

Design: Prospective study.

Setting: Tertiary-care medical institution.

Patients: 79 patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.

Interventions: Simultaneous SPECT and real-time MCE during adenosine stress.

Main outcome measures: Absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF, ml/min/g), microbubble velocity (β, min–1), and reserve values. Endpoints included sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR+) or negative likelihood ratio (LR–) and area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve.

Results: Reserve measurements were feasible in 975 of 1343 segments (73%); of these, 130 segments (13%) were abnormal by SPECT. MCE perfusion parameters clearly distinguished abnormal from normal segments for β reserve (1.13 (0.99) vs 2.22 (1.36), p<0.001) and MBF reserve (1.80 (2.29) vs 3.69 (2.79), p<0.001). The β reserve cut-off of 1.60 provided the following: AUC, 0.787; sensitivity, 82%; specificity, 66%; LR+, 2.40; and LR–, 0.28. The MBF reserve cut-off of 1.90 provided the following: AUC, 0.779; sensitivity, 73%; specificity, 72%; LR+, 2.69; and LR–, 0.37. MBF reserve had an AUC of 0.773 for the left anterior descending coronary artery, 0.885 for the left circumflex coronary artery and 0.739 for the right coronary artery.

Conclusions: Real-time MCE-derived absolute MBF, β, and reserve values are feasible and accurate for detecting myocardial perfusion abnormalities as defined by SPECT.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.