Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 10 December 2007. doi:10.1136/hrt.2007.125898
Heart 2009;95:203-209
Copyright © 2009 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Cardiovascular Society

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Cooled ablation reduces pulmonary vein isolation time: results of a prospective randomised trial

N Pérez-Castellano, J Villacastin, J Salinas, J Moreno, M Doblado, E Ruiz, R Isa, C Macaya

Unit of Arrhythmias, Cardiovascular Institute, San Carlos University Hospital, Madrid, Spain

Dr N Pérez-Castellano, Unidad de Arritmias, Instituto Cardiovascular, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, C/ Professor Martín Lagos s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain; nperez.hcsc{at}salud.madrid.org

Background: Currently, selection of the ablation catheter for pulmonary vein (PV) isolation is a matter of choice.

Objective: To evaluate the efficiency of cooled ablation for PV isolation.

Methods: A prospective randomised trial was carried out comparing the time required to disconnect each targeted PV using cooled ablation (open irrigation at 15 ml/min, group A) or standard temperature-controlled 4 mm tip catheter ablation (group B). The ablation parameter limit settings were 45°C, 35 (5) W in group A, and 55°C, 35 (5) W in group B.

Results: Thirty-six patients referred for a first atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedure were randomised to group A or group B (18 patients in each group). There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the groups. Bidirectional block was achieved in 61/61 PVs from group A (100%) and 59/61 PVs from group B (97%); p = NS. Time to PV disconnection was significantly shorter in group A than in group B (median (25th–75th centiles) 14 (5–28) min vs 19 (14–32) min, respectively; p = 0.003). Five asymptomatic PV stenoses were identified by MRI, all in group B (p = 0.05). After 1-year minimum follow-up, AF recurrences were less frequently documented in patients treated with cooled ablation (6% vs 33%; p = 0.05).

Conclusion: Cooled ablation is more efficient than standard ablation in achieving PV isolation. Results obtained from this study also suggest a potential benefit of clinical efficacy and safety from cooled ablation, which should be further evaluated in larger clinical trials.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Wang, X, Liu, X, Shi, H, Gu, J, Sun, Y, Zhou, L, Hu, W (2009). Pulmonary vein isolation combined with substrate modification for persistent atrial fibrillation treatment in patients with valvular heart diseases. Heart 95: 1773-1783 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.