HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
[Advanced]

Heart. Published Online First: 24 July 2008. doi:10.1136/hrt.2008.146688
Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Cardiovascular Society

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kulik, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ruel, M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kulik, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ruel, M.

Original articles

Gender Differences in the Long-term Outcomes after Valve Replacement Surgery

Alexander Kulik 1, B-Khanh Lam 1, Fraser D. Rubens 1, Paul J. Hendry 1, Roy G. Masters 1, William Goldstein 1, Pierre Bédard 1, Thierry G. Mesana 1 and Marc Ruel 1*

1 University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Canada

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mruel{at}ottawaheart.ca.

Accepted 24 June 2008


*  Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term outcomes of women and men after valve replacement surgery.

Design: Observational study.

Setting: Postoperative aortic valve replacement (AVR) or mitral valve replacement (MVR).

Patients: 3118 patients (1261 women, 1857 men) who underwent AVR or MVR between 1976 and 2006 (2255 AVR, 863 MVR), with mean follow-up of 5.6±4.5 years.

Main outcome measures: The independent effect of gender on the risk of long-term complications (reoperation, stroke, and death) after valve replacement surgery using multivariate actuarial methods.

Results: After implantation of an aortic valve bioprosthesis, women had a significantly lower rate of reoperation compared to men (comorbidity-adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 0.4; 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.2, 0.9). In contrast, if an aortic mechanical prosthesis had been implanted, women were more at risk for late stroke compared to men (HR: 1.7; CI: 1.1, 2.7). After adjustment for age and co-morbidities, women had significantly better long-term survival compared to men after bioprosthetic AVR (HR: 0.5; CI: 0.3, 0.6), but there was no survival difference between genders after mechanical AVR. Trends existed towards better survival for women after bioprosthetic MVR (HR: 0.6; CI: 0.4, 1.0) and mechanical MVR (HR: 0.8; CI: 0.5, 1.1).

Conclusion: The long-term outcomes after valve replacement surgery differ between women and men. Although women have more late strokes after valve replacement, they undergo fewer reoperations and have better overall long-term survival compared to men.








HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Cardiovascular Society