Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Heart. Published Online First: 14 June 2009. doi:10.1136/hrt.2009.172619
Copyright © 2009 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Cardiovascular Society

Original articles

Lipid Re-screening: What Is the Best Measure and Interval?

Osamu Takahashi 1*, Paul P Glasziou 1, Rafael Perera 1, Takuro Shimbo 2, Jiro Suwa 3, Sonoe Hiramatsu 3 and Tsuguya Fukui 4

1 Department of Primary Health Care, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
2 Department of Clinical Research and Informatics, International Medical Centre of Japan, Japan
3 Centre for Preventive Medicine, St. Luke's International Hospital, Japan
4 Division of General Internal Medicin, Department of Medicine, St. Luke's International Hospital, Japan

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: otakahas{at}gmail.com.

Accepted 2 June 2009


Abstract

Objectives: To estimate the long-term true change variation ("signal") and short-term within-person variation ("noise") of the different lipids measures and evaluate the best measure and the optimal interval for lipid re-screening.

Design: Retrospective cohort study from 2005 to 2008.

Setting: Centre for Preventive Medicine at a teaching hospital in Tokyo, Japan.

Participants: 15810 adults not taking cholesterol-lowering medications at baseline.

Main outcome measures: Annual measurement of the serum total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and calculated the ratio of TC/HDL and LDL/HDL. We estimated the ratio of long-term drift ("signal") to the short-term within-person variation ("noise") for each measure.

Results: At baseline, participants (53% male) with a mean age of 49 years old (range: 21 to 92) and a mean TC level of 5.3 mmol/L (SD, 0.9 mmol/L) had annual check-ups over 4 years. Short-term within-person variations of TC, LDL, HDL, TC/HDL, and LDL/HDL were 0.12 (coefficient of variation (CV), 6.4%), 0.08 (CV: 9.4%), 0.02 (CV: 8.0%), 0.08 (CV: 7.9%) and 0.05(CV: 10.6%) mmol2/L2 respectively. The ratio of signal to noise at 3 years was largest for TC/HDL (1.6), followed by LDL/HDL (1.5), LDL (0.99), TC (0.8), and HDL (0.7), suggesting cholesterol ratios are more sensitive re-screening measures.

Conclusion: The signal-to-noise ratios of standard single lipid measures (TC, LDL, and HDL) are weak over 3 years and decisions based on these measures are potentially misleading. The ratio, TC/HDL and LDL/HDL, appears to be better measure for monitoring assessments. The lipid re-screening interval should be more than 3 years for those not taking cholesterol-lowering drugs.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.