Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Heart 1997;78:327-328; doi:10.1136/hrt.78.4.327
Copyright © 1997 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Cardiovascular Society

Heart 1997;78:327-328 ( October )

Editorial

When should patients with acute myocardial infarction be transferred for primary angioplasty?

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

The results of several randomised trials have shown superior outcomes with primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction compared to thrombolytic treatment.1-4 Primary angioplasty establishes TIMI-3 flow in the infarct artery in 93-97% of patients1,5 compared with 54% with accelerated t-PA.6 Pooled data from three randomised trials have shown lower hospital mortality (2.2% v 5.9%, p = 0.02) and less non-fatal re-infarction (1.9% v 8.1%, p = 0.001) in patients treated with primary angioplasty versus thrombolytic treatment.1-3 Intracranial haemorrhage, the most feared complication of thrombolysis, occurred significantly less often with primary angioplasty versus t-PA in both the PAMI-1 trial (0% v 2.0%, p = 0.05)1 and the GUSTO-IIB trial (0% v 1.4%, p = 0.008).4 In addition, several studies have documented shorter hospital stay and comparable or lower hospital costs with primary angioplasty.7-9 Because of these data, primary angioplasty has emerged as the preferred reperfusion strategy for acute myocardial infarction in institutions with interventional facilities and skilled operators.

Limited . . . [Full text of this article]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Widimsky, P., Budesinsky, T., Vorac, D., Groch, L., Zelizko, M., Aschermann, M., Branny, M., St'asek, J., Formanek, P., on behalf of the 'PRAGUE' Study Group Investigator, (2003). Long distance transport for primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction: Final results of the randomized national multicentre trial--PRAGUE-2. Eur Heart J 24: 94-104 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Ribichini, F., Wijns, W. (2002). ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION: REPERFUSION TREATMENT. Heart 88: 298-305 [Full Text]  
  • Kovac, J.D., Gershlick, A.H. (2001). How should we detect and manage failed thrombolysis?. Eur Heart J 22: 450-457  
  • Brodie, B. R., Stuckey, T. D., Wall, T. C., Kissling, G., Hansen, C. J., Muncy, D. B., Weintraub, R. A., Kelly, T. A. (1998). Importance of time to reperfusion for 30-day and late survival and recovery of left ventricular function after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 32: 1312-1319 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.