Editorial
Infarct angioplasty
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Although secondary prevention and rehabilitation are essential for optimising care for patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction, the best outcomes are achieved with treatments that rapidly restore normal coronary artery flow and then maintain patency. To minimise time to treatment, patients can either be thrombolysed en route to hospital or be assessed and sometimes treated directly by paramedics in appropriately equipped ambulances (bypassing the family doctor).1-3
Once the patient is in the coronary care unit (CCU), further assessment is required. If no prehospital treatment has been provided, the patient should receive either thrombolytic treatment or primary angioplasty. If thrombolytic therapy has already been given, alternative strategies should be considered if it appears to have failed.
There is still considerable debate about the relative merits of
thrombolytic treatment and angioplasty. The PAMI (primary angioplasty
in myocardial infarction) study group and Zwolle et al have established that primary angioplasty can be highly
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Corfield, A R, Graham, C A, Adams, J N, Booth, I, McGuffie, A C
(2004). Emergency department thrombolysis improves door to needle times. Emerg. Med. J.
21: 676-680
[Abstract] [Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
