Images in cardiology
Pitfall in the diagnosis of pericardial effusion by echocardiography
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
A 65 year old man with an 18 year history of ischaemic heart disease was admitted with a six week history of severe weakness and orthostatic hypotension. Eight weeks before admission he underwent echocardiography at his local hospital to evaluate exertional dyspnoea; pericardial effusion was suspected. Because of poor ultrasound conduction, ventricular or valvar function could not be evaluated. The patient was treated with diuretics; however, symptoms did not improve and the diuretics were increased to a maximum of 750 mg frusemide daily.
On admission there were no clinical findings of heart failure. The patient had severe orthostatic hypotension and felt vertiginous. Transthoracic echocardiography (A) revealed normal systolic left ventricular function and thickened left ventricular wall. The subepicar-dial space was enlarged to about 2 cm, which appeared not to be completely free from echos suggesting chronic pericardial effusion. Magnetic resonance imaging (B) and computed tomography revealed density of the subepicardial space from fat tissue.
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
