Editorial
Absolute, attributable, and relative risk in the management of coronary heart disease
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Treatment decisions in the prevention and management of coronary heart disease (CHD) often require knowledge about the level of risk. Risk is defined as the probability of encountering a particular event. Information about risk is obtained from cohort studies or other longitudinal studies such as randomised controlled trials. In these studies, risk is simply the incidence of the event in a particular group. For example, the risk (or probability) of death associated with coronary angiography is 0.1% (or 1 in 1000).1 This is termed the absolute risk.
In order to inform clinical decisions, it is often useful to compare the absolute risk in two or more groups having different exposures or different treatments (including treatment versus no treatment). The two main measures we use when comparing risk are attributable risk (risk difference) and relative risk (risk ratio).
Attributable riskAttributable risk measures the excess risk
accounted for by exposure
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Leung, D Y, French, J K
(2006). End points in clinical trials: are they moving the goalposts?. Heart
92: 870-872
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Young, T., Peppard, P. E., Taheri, S.
(2005). Excess weight and sleep-disordered breathing. J. Appl. Physiol.
99: 1592-1599
[Abstract] [Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
