Editorial
Ultrasound guided stenting
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The
routine use of intracoronary stents to reduce acute complications and
improve the clinical outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention is
now well established, with a reduction in the complications of acute
closure, myocardial infarction, and emergency surgery, as well as the
six month restenosis rate by up to 50%.1-3 However, with
the continued incidence of subacute stent thrombosis and the fact that
a six month clinical restenosis rate of 10-20% still exists, this
suggests that stenting, particularly in "non-Benestent" lesions,4 is less than perfect. Initial experience with
coronary stent deployment was characterised by a high thrombosis rate
despite aggressive anticoagulant regimens, which increased the risk of early vascular complications.5 6 Improvements in clinical outcomes followed from the use of antiplatelet rather than
anticoagulant drugs,7 better stent designs, and the
evidence from intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) of suboptimal stent
expansion with lower pressure deployment. Studies using the latter
technique showed that full stent
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
