Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Heart 2001;85:613-614; doi:10.1136/heart.85.6.613
Copyright © 2001 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Cardiovascular Society
Heart 2001;85:613-614 ( June )

Journal scan

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

    JOURNALSCAN

Please visit the Heart website (www.heartjnl.com) for links to these articles-many to full text.


    ISCHAEMIC HEART DISEASE

The panel decides that the UK under uses revascularisation . . .and this is bad for the patient: A panel of cardiologists, surgeons, epidemiologists, and others considered the evidence for revascularisation in multiple clinical scenarios. They then assessed clinical outcome based on whether the strategy that the panel would have chosen was applied retrospectively in a group of over 2500 patients undergoing angiography. They showed that revascularisation was underused, and that if the panel's decision was not followed, then the patients had more angina but also higher mortality.

 1 Hemingway H, Crook AM, Feder G, Banerjee S, Dawson JR, Magee P, Philpott S, Sanders J, Wood A, Timmis AD. Underuse of coronary revascularization procedures in patients considered appropriate candidates for revascularization. N Engl J Med 2001;344:645-54[Abstract/Full Text].

Your genes decide if moderate alcohol intake . . . [Full text of this article]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.