Editorial
Consent in cardiac practice
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The
issue of consent has a particular bearing on cardiac practice. Cardiac
disease is common, has serious consequences, and frequently requires
invasive investigations and treatments. In this issue there are several
articles relating to the issue of consent. These range from the concise
legal perspective1 to the actual data from studies
assessing the patient's perspective.2-4 The issue of
consent must be considered in the wider context.5 There is
an ongoing social shift with a greater focus on the "individual" and away from the "community". This has transformed many other spheres of society and is altering the doctor-patient relationship. Individuals wish to be more in control of their lives, or perhaps more
importantly perceive to be in control of their lives, and that their
individual needs are paramount. Although the individual's (or
patient's) autonomy has long been recognised, in the past it has not
been so strongly emphasised. This in part
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Petch, M C
(2002). Heart disease, guidelines, regulations, and the law. Heart
87: 472-479
[Full Text] -
Doyal, L
(2002). Good clinical practice and informed consent are inseparable. Heart
87: 103-105
[Abstract] [Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
